Impact of Pre-admission Observation Hours on Key Physical Therapist Clinical Education Stakeholders: Qualitative Analysis

T. Hoang, M. Watkins, Jamie Bayliss, Judi Schack-Dugre, Katy Mitchell, Mira Mariano, Jamie L. Greco, Y. Colgrove, E. Wheeler, H. Kiyota, C. Pientok, Lori Stephens, C. McCarthy, L. Canham, G. McBride, P. Gleeson
{"title":"Impact of Pre-admission Observation Hours on Key Physical Therapist Clinical Education Stakeholders: Qualitative Analysis","authors":"T. Hoang, M. Watkins, Jamie Bayliss, Judi Schack-Dugre, Katy Mitchell, Mira Mariano, Jamie L. Greco, Y. Colgrove, E. Wheeler, H. Kiyota, C. Pientok, Lori Stephens, C. McCarthy, L. Canham, G. McBride, P. Gleeson","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Introduction. Inclusion of preadmission observation hours (ObHr) as one component of the admissions process is commonly required in physical therapy education programs. The purpose of this study was to describe the value and impact of ObHr on 4 key stakeholder groups: doctor of physical therapy students, physical therapy clinicians, directors of clinical education, and admissions committee (AC) members. Review of Literature. The number of required and/or recommended ObHr and practice settings varies greatly. No previous study has explored a national dataset of key stakeholders' perspectives on ObHr experiences. Subjects. Four key stakeholder groups were targeted in the study (N = 4,471). Methods. Four stakeholder surveys were developed and distributed via email using a snowball sampling technique. Responses to the open-ended questions were analyzed using conventional content analysis for creating codes, categories, and themes within and across groups. Results. Five main themes emerged: 1) ObHr have value in career decision making; 2) students driven by hours, but all stakeholders value variety; 3) use of ObHr for program admissions decisions varies; 4) as the number of hours and settings increase, so do the challenges for students; and 5) there is interest in developing alternative ObHr experiences. Discussion and Conclusion. There was consensus among all stakeholder groups regarding ObHr's value for exploring the profession of physical therapy and helping applicants determine if the profession is a good fit. Respondents highlighted the value of observing in a variety of practice settings. Perspectives differed between AC members and students regarding the impact of ObHr on admissions decision making. Students reported a variety of personal and organizational challenges associated with ObHr completion. Physical therapy programs should reexamine their current ObHr practices and consider alternative methods that support all applicants in their pursuit of a career in physical therapy.","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":"36 1","pages":"107 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Introduction. Inclusion of preadmission observation hours (ObHr) as one component of the admissions process is commonly required in physical therapy education programs. The purpose of this study was to describe the value and impact of ObHr on 4 key stakeholder groups: doctor of physical therapy students, physical therapy clinicians, directors of clinical education, and admissions committee (AC) members. Review of Literature. The number of required and/or recommended ObHr and practice settings varies greatly. No previous study has explored a national dataset of key stakeholders' perspectives on ObHr experiences. Subjects. Four key stakeholder groups were targeted in the study (N = 4,471). Methods. Four stakeholder surveys were developed and distributed via email using a snowball sampling technique. Responses to the open-ended questions were analyzed using conventional content analysis for creating codes, categories, and themes within and across groups. Results. Five main themes emerged: 1) ObHr have value in career decision making; 2) students driven by hours, but all stakeholders value variety; 3) use of ObHr for program admissions decisions varies; 4) as the number of hours and settings increase, so do the challenges for students; and 5) there is interest in developing alternative ObHr experiences. Discussion and Conclusion. There was consensus among all stakeholder groups regarding ObHr's value for exploring the profession of physical therapy and helping applicants determine if the profession is a good fit. Respondents highlighted the value of observing in a variety of practice settings. Perspectives differed between AC members and students regarding the impact of ObHr on admissions decision making. Students reported a variety of personal and organizational challenges associated with ObHr completion. Physical therapy programs should reexamine their current ObHr practices and consider alternative methods that support all applicants in their pursuit of a career in physical therapy.
入院前观察时间对主要物理治疗师临床教育利益相关者的影响:定性分析
文本中提供了补充数字内容。介绍在物理治疗教育项目中,通常需要将任务前观察时间(ObHr)作为录取过程的一个组成部分。本研究的目的是描述ObHr对4个关键利益相关者群体的价值和影响:物理治疗医生学生、物理治疗临床医生、临床教育主任和招生委员会(AC)成员。文献综述。所需和/或推荐的ObHr和练习设置的数量差异很大。此前没有任何研究探讨过关键利益相关者对ObHr经验的看法的国家数据集。受试者。本研究针对四个主要利益相关者群体(N=4471)。方法。采用滚雪球抽样技术,通过电子邮件编制并分发了四份利益相关者调查。使用传统的内容分析来分析对开放式问题的回答,以在组内和组间创建代码、类别和主题。后果出现了五个主要主题:1)ObHr在职业决策中具有价值;2) 学生受时间驱动,但所有利益相关者都重视多样性;3) ObHr在项目招生决策中的使用各不相同;4) 随着时间和环境的增加,学生面临的挑战也在增加;以及5)人们对开发替代ObHr体验感兴趣。讨论和结论。所有利益相关者团体都一致认为ObHr在探索物理治疗专业和帮助申请人确定该专业是否适合方面的价值。受访者强调了在各种实践环境中观察的价值。关于ObHr对招生决策的影响,AC成员和学生的观点各不相同。学生们报告了与完成ObHr相关的各种个人和组织挑战。物理治疗项目应该重新审查他们目前的ObHr实践,并考虑支持所有申请者追求物理治疗职业的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信