Lower limbs muscle activation during instep kick in soccer: effects of dominance and ball condition

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Rodrigo Rabello, Filippo Bertozzi, M. Galli, M. Zago, C. Sforza
{"title":"Lower limbs muscle activation during instep kick in soccer: effects of dominance and ball condition","authors":"Rodrigo Rabello, Filippo Bertozzi, M. Galli, M. Zago, C. Sforza","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2021.1884283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Muscle activation has been studied in soccer players kicking stationary balls with the dominant foot. This study evaluated swinging and support limb muscle activation during the instep kick using different feet and ball approach conditions.Vastus medialis (VM), biceps femoris (BF), gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and tibialis anterior (TA) activations were evaluated during maximal instep kicks with both feet and the ball in five conditions (n = 18): stationary (STAT), approaching anteriorly (ANT), posteriorly (POST), laterally (LAT) and medially (MED). A repeated-measures two-way ANOVA compared activations between feet and ball conditions throughout the kicking (0–100%) and follow-through phases (101–200%). Close to ball contact (81–124%), non-dominant support GM had greater activation than the dominant one. The LAT and MED conditions differed within the cycle in the swinging VM (0–21%; 191–200%), BF (13–70%; 121–161%), GM (22–82%; 121–143%) and TA (0–32%; 55–97%; 186–200%) and in support VM (0–81%), BF (6–24%; 121–161%) and GM (24–87%). Players require greater support GM activation to stabilize the ankle during non-dominant kicks. Muscle activation differences between LAT and MED indicate that the kicking strategies are altered when kicking balls approaching from different directions.","PeriodicalId":48512,"journal":{"name":"Science and Medicine in Football","volume":"6 1","pages":"40 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2021.1884283","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Medicine in Football","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2021.1884283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Muscle activation has been studied in soccer players kicking stationary balls with the dominant foot. This study evaluated swinging and support limb muscle activation during the instep kick using different feet and ball approach conditions.Vastus medialis (VM), biceps femoris (BF), gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and tibialis anterior (TA) activations were evaluated during maximal instep kicks with both feet and the ball in five conditions (n = 18): stationary (STAT), approaching anteriorly (ANT), posteriorly (POST), laterally (LAT) and medially (MED). A repeated-measures two-way ANOVA compared activations between feet and ball conditions throughout the kicking (0–100%) and follow-through phases (101–200%). Close to ball contact (81–124%), non-dominant support GM had greater activation than the dominant one. The LAT and MED conditions differed within the cycle in the swinging VM (0–21%; 191–200%), BF (13–70%; 121–161%), GM (22–82%; 121–143%) and TA (0–32%; 55–97%; 186–200%) and in support VM (0–81%), BF (6–24%; 121–161%) and GM (24–87%). Players require greater support GM activation to stabilize the ankle during non-dominant kicks. Muscle activation differences between LAT and MED indicate that the kicking strategies are altered when kicking balls approaching from different directions.
足球中脚背踢时下肢肌肉的激活:优势和球状态的影响
摘要:研究了足球运动员用优势脚踢固定球时的肌肉激活。本研究在不同的脚和球接近条件下评估脚背踢时摆动和支撑肢体肌肉的激活。在五种情况下(n = 18),用双脚和球进行最大脚背踢时,评估股内侧肌(VM)、股二头肌(BF)、腓肠肌内侧肌(GM)和胫骨前肌(TA)的激活情况:静止(STAT)、向前(ANT)、向后(POST)、外侧(LAT)和内侧(MED)。重复测量的双向方差分析比较了脚和球在踢脚(0-100%)和跟随阶段(101-200%)的激活情况。在接近球接触处(81-124%),非优势支撑GM的激活率高于优势支撑GM。摆动VM周期内LAT和MED条件不同(0-21%;191-200%), bf (13-70%;121-161%), gm (22-82%;121-143%)和TA (0-32%;55 - 97%;支持VM (0-81%), BF (6-24%);121-161%)和GM(24-87%)。球员需要更大的支持GM激活来稳定脚踝在非优势踢。LAT和MED之间的肌肉激活差异表明,当踢球从不同方向靠近时,踢球策略会发生改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信