Coyote Management Plans and Wildlife Watch: implications for community coaching approach to public outreach in southern California

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 FISHERIES
A. Heeren, H. Bowman, Victoria Monroe, D. Dodge, Kent Smirl
{"title":"Coyote Management Plans and Wildlife Watch: implications for community coaching approach to public outreach in southern California","authors":"A. Heeren, H. Bowman, Victoria Monroe, D. Dodge, Kent Smirl","doi":"10.51492/cfwj.hwisi.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The majority of residents in southern California live in urban areas. Therefore, working with cities to promote tolerance and coexistence with urban wildlife is crucial to the conservation and management of native species. Human conflicts with coyotes (Canis latrans) illustrate the importance of incorporating the social sciences, particularly knowledge of human behavior, communication, and education, in a coyote management strategy. Here, we review 199 cities across southern California to determine which localities have a coyote management website or a coyote management plan. We also included cities that have collaborated with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in developing a “Wildlife Watch” program model. Wildlife Watch (based on the Neighborhood Watch national crime prevention program) uses conservation-oriented principles to empower local communities, agencies, and residents to remove wildlife attractants and to exclude or deter coyotes from neighborhoods. We examine how cities with coyote management websites and programs differ from cities without, based on U.S. census demographics. Using data from coyote conflict and sighting tools (Coyote Cacher, iNaturalist, and CDFW’s Wildlife Incident Reporting System) we compare coyote reports across cities with different management plans and websites. Finally, based on demographics from the US Census, we examine ways Wildlife Watch, or related programs, can be expanded and improved. An adaptive community-based program, like Wildlife Watch, offers a valuable toolkit to managers for navigating the diverse array of human perceptions, values, and attitudes regarding urban species and human-wildlife conflicts.","PeriodicalId":29697,"journal":{"name":"California Fish and Wildlife Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California Fish and Wildlife Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51492/cfwj.hwisi.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The majority of residents in southern California live in urban areas. Therefore, working with cities to promote tolerance and coexistence with urban wildlife is crucial to the conservation and management of native species. Human conflicts with coyotes (Canis latrans) illustrate the importance of incorporating the social sciences, particularly knowledge of human behavior, communication, and education, in a coyote management strategy. Here, we review 199 cities across southern California to determine which localities have a coyote management website or a coyote management plan. We also included cities that have collaborated with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in developing a “Wildlife Watch” program model. Wildlife Watch (based on the Neighborhood Watch national crime prevention program) uses conservation-oriented principles to empower local communities, agencies, and residents to remove wildlife attractants and to exclude or deter coyotes from neighborhoods. We examine how cities with coyote management websites and programs differ from cities without, based on U.S. census demographics. Using data from coyote conflict and sighting tools (Coyote Cacher, iNaturalist, and CDFW’s Wildlife Incident Reporting System) we compare coyote reports across cities with different management plans and websites. Finally, based on demographics from the US Census, we examine ways Wildlife Watch, or related programs, can be expanded and improved. An adaptive community-based program, like Wildlife Watch, offers a valuable toolkit to managers for navigating the diverse array of human perceptions, values, and attitudes regarding urban species and human-wildlife conflicts.
郊狼管理计划和野生动物观察:南加州社区指导方法对公众外展的影响
南加州的大多数居民生活在城市地区。因此,与城市合作,促进与城市野生动物的宽容和共存,对于保护和管理本地物种至关重要。人类与郊狼(Canis latrans)的冲突说明了将社会科学,特别是人类行为、沟通和教育知识纳入郊狼管理战略的重要性。在这里,我们回顾了加州南部的199个城市,以确定哪些地方有郊狼管理网站或郊狼管理计划。我们还包括与加州鱼类和野生动物部合作开发“野生动物观察”项目模式的城市。野生动物观察(基于邻里观察国家犯罪预防计划)利用以保护为导向的原则,授权当地社区、机构和居民清除野生动物引诱剂,并将郊狼排除或阻止在社区之外。根据美国人口普查的人口统计数据,我们研究了有郊狼管理网站和项目的城市与没有的城市有何不同。使用来自郊狼冲突和目击工具(coyote Cacher、iNaturalist和CDFW的野生动物事件报告系统)的数据,我们比较了不同管理计划和网站的城市郊狼报告。最后,根据美国人口普查的人口统计数据,我们研究了如何扩大和改进野生动物观察或相关项目。一个适应性的社区项目,如野生动物观察,为管理者提供了一个宝贵的工具包,用于了解人类对城市物种和人类与野生动物冲突的各种看法、价值观和态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信