Readiness of Medical Institutions, Academics and Practitioners for the Covid-19 Outbreak

Q4 Health Professions
L. Baig, Mehjabeen Musharraf, M. Uzair, Shiraz Shaikh
{"title":"Readiness of Medical Institutions, Academics and Practitioners for the Covid-19 Outbreak","authors":"L. Baig, Mehjabeen Musharraf, M. Uzair, Shiraz Shaikh","doi":"10.36570/jduhs.2021.3.1178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the readiness of medical institutions of Pakistan to the Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) outbreak. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in two medical institutes of Sindh and Punjab from Aug - Nov 2020. Faculty members of both institutes were asked to fill an online questionnaire. Readiness to deal with COVID-19 outbreak was evaluated by implementation of the standard operating procedure (SOP), lifestyle modifications, and stress levels. Impact of Event Scale (I ES) -15 items version was used to assess stress level. The total score interpreted as 0 to 8 subclinical range, 9 to 25 mild range, 26 to 43 moderate range, and 44 plus severe range. Results: Out of 111 participants, private sector was more prepared to deal with COVI D-19 'n terms of availability of infection control materials and following of SOPs. However, public sector showed improved numbers 13 (59.1%) for \"performing refresher training for healthcare providers on infection control guidelines\" as compared to private sector 30 (33.7%) (p-value 0.029). Though, both public and private sector institute reported moderate level of stress, the total mean score on IES was insignificantly higher in public sector institute than private sector, i.e., 30 ± 14.2 vs. 26.74 ±14-5 (p-value 0.252). Conclusion: The academics and practitioners of public and private medical institutions were moderately stressed due to the fear of the possibility of contracting COVI D-19 at the workplace and spreading it to the loved ones. © 2021 Dow University of Health Sciences. All Rights Reserved.","PeriodicalId":34119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36570/jduhs.2021.3.1178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the readiness of medical institutions of Pakistan to the Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) outbreak. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in two medical institutes of Sindh and Punjab from Aug - Nov 2020. Faculty members of both institutes were asked to fill an online questionnaire. Readiness to deal with COVID-19 outbreak was evaluated by implementation of the standard operating procedure (SOP), lifestyle modifications, and stress levels. Impact of Event Scale (I ES) -15 items version was used to assess stress level. The total score interpreted as 0 to 8 subclinical range, 9 to 25 mild range, 26 to 43 moderate range, and 44 plus severe range. Results: Out of 111 participants, private sector was more prepared to deal with COVI D-19 'n terms of availability of infection control materials and following of SOPs. However, public sector showed improved numbers 13 (59.1%) for "performing refresher training for healthcare providers on infection control guidelines" as compared to private sector 30 (33.7%) (p-value 0.029). Though, both public and private sector institute reported moderate level of stress, the total mean score on IES was insignificantly higher in public sector institute than private sector, i.e., 30 ± 14.2 vs. 26.74 ±14-5 (p-value 0.252). Conclusion: The academics and practitioners of public and private medical institutions were moderately stressed due to the fear of the possibility of contracting COVI D-19 at the workplace and spreading it to the loved ones. © 2021 Dow University of Health Sciences. All Rights Reserved.
医疗机构、学者和从业人员应对新冠肺炎疫情的准备情况
目的:评估巴基斯坦医疗机构应对新型冠状病毒肺炎(新冠肺炎)疫情的准备情况。方法:这项横断面研究于2020年8月至11月在信德省和旁遮普邦的两个医疗机构进行。两所学院的教员都被要求填写一份在线问卷。通过标准操作程序(SOP)的实施、生活方式的改变和压力水平来评估应对新冠肺炎疫情的准备情况。事件影响量表(IES)-15项版本用于评估压力水平。总分解释为0至8亚临床范围、9至25轻度范围、26至43中度范围和44加重度范围。结果:在111名参与者中,私营部门在感染控制材料的可用性和SOP的遵循方面更愿意应对COVI D-19。然而,与私营部门的30分(33.7%)(p值0.029)相比,公共部门的“为医疗保健提供者进行感染控制指南进修培训”的数字提高了13分(59.1%)。尽管公共和私营部门研究所都报告了中等程度的压力,但公共部门研究所IES的总平均分并不显著高于私营部门,即30±14.2 vs.26.74±14-5(p值0.252)。结论:公立和私立医疗机构的学者和从业者由于担心在工作场所感染新冠病毒D-19并将其传播给亲人的可能性而受到适度压力。©2021陶氏健康科学大学。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences
Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信