Paraphrasing Interventions and Problem-Solving Accuracy: Do Generative Procedures Help English Language Learners with Math Difficulties?

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
H. Lee Swanson, Jennifer E. Kong, Amber S. Moran, Michael J. Orosco
{"title":"Paraphrasing Interventions and Problem-Solving Accuracy: Do Generative Procedures Help English Language Learners with Math Difficulties?","authors":"H. Lee Swanson,&nbsp;Jennifer E. Kong,&nbsp;Amber S. Moran,&nbsp;Michael J. Orosco","doi":"10.1111/ldrp.12194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This randomized control treatment study investigated the role of generative paraphrasing interventions on word problem-solving (WPS) accuracy in English language learners (ELL) who were at risk for math difficulties (MD). One hundred and forty-two third-grade monolingual and English language learners were randomly assigned to either an untreated control group or one of three treatment conditions: paraphrase question (<i>Restate</i>), paraphrase relevant information (<i>Relevant</i>), and paraphrase all propositions (<i>Complete</i>). Results showed that the <i>relevant</i> treatment condition improved WPS accuracy for monolingual and ELL children's accuracy relative to the control and restate condition. There were, however, no positive advantages on the transfer measures (knowledge of problem-solving components, calculation) for ELL children with MD. In addition, the magnitude of posttest outcomes on the problem-solving measures was substantially smaller for ELL children with MD than for children without MD. Although the results overall support the notion that generative learning improves problem-solving accuracy, ELL children without MD are most likely to benefit from its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":47426,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","volume":"34 2","pages":"68-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ldrp.12194","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ldrp.12194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This randomized control treatment study investigated the role of generative paraphrasing interventions on word problem-solving (WPS) accuracy in English language learners (ELL) who were at risk for math difficulties (MD). One hundred and forty-two third-grade monolingual and English language learners were randomly assigned to either an untreated control group or one of three treatment conditions: paraphrase question (Restate), paraphrase relevant information (Relevant), and paraphrase all propositions (Complete). Results showed that the relevant treatment condition improved WPS accuracy for monolingual and ELL children's accuracy relative to the control and restate condition. There were, however, no positive advantages on the transfer measures (knowledge of problem-solving components, calculation) for ELL children with MD. In addition, the magnitude of posttest outcomes on the problem-solving measures was substantially smaller for ELL children with MD than for children without MD. Although the results overall support the notion that generative learning improves problem-solving accuracy, ELL children without MD are most likely to benefit from its application.

释义干预和问题解决的准确性:生成过程对英语学习者的数学困难有帮助吗?
本随机对照治疗研究探讨了生成式释义干预对存在数学困难(MD)风险的英语语言学习者(ELL)单词解决问题(WPS)准确性的影响。142名三年级单语学习者和英语学习者被随机分配到未经治疗的对照组或三种治疗条件之一:释义问题(重述),释义相关信息(相关)和释义所有命题(完成)。结果显示,相对于对照和重述条件,相关治疗条件提高了单语和外语儿童WPS的准确性。然而,患有MD的ELL儿童在迁移测量(解决问题组成部分的知识,计算)方面没有积极的优势。此外,患有MD的ELL儿童在解决问题测量方面的后测结果显著小于没有MD的儿童。尽管结果总体上支持生成学习提高解决问题准确性的观点,但没有MD的ELL儿童最有可能从其应用中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信