Joyful noise and abatement: idle chatter and the undercommons of oracy education

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Literacy Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1111/lit.12300
Lea Rackley, Tishawn Bradford
{"title":"Joyful noise and abatement: idle chatter and the undercommons of oracy education","authors":"Lea Rackley,&nbsp;Tishawn Bradford","doi":"10.1111/lit.12300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper imagines oracy education as a reaching-out for connection with the irreducible socialities of black study. In the wake of imperialist functions of literacy, classroom talk has been left to defend its value against traditionalist views which rebuke, as one UK education minister put it, “idle chatter in class.” We argue that oracy education risks doubling down on the value system outlined by this rebuke – and the white settler-colonial onto/auto-epistemology mobilised therein – if it measures the value of talk within this purview. We follow the undercommons of black study and the poetics of relation toward revaluations of idle chatter and noise as modes of thought. We explore the abundant participations of noise beyond the colonial errand of abatement, and we elaborate the relational stakes that idle chatter may invent. We reorient the stakes of the learning conversation with its single guiding lesson into the vibrant jazz riff of a learning cacophony that leaves the continuous echo of possible lessons behind it, proposing new ways of valuing oracy education and new possibilities for participation. Our chatty inquiry practices this ethics, overlapping our shared classroom experiences with discussions of theory and our discussions of theory with yet new possible experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":46082,"journal":{"name":"Literacy","volume":"56 3","pages":"191-198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.12300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper imagines oracy education as a reaching-out for connection with the irreducible socialities of black study. In the wake of imperialist functions of literacy, classroom talk has been left to defend its value against traditionalist views which rebuke, as one UK education minister put it, “idle chatter in class.” We argue that oracy education risks doubling down on the value system outlined by this rebuke – and the white settler-colonial onto/auto-epistemology mobilised therein – if it measures the value of talk within this purview. We follow the undercommons of black study and the poetics of relation toward revaluations of idle chatter and noise as modes of thought. We explore the abundant participations of noise beyond the colonial errand of abatement, and we elaborate the relational stakes that idle chatter may invent. We reorient the stakes of the learning conversation with its single guiding lesson into the vibrant jazz riff of a learning cacophony that leaves the continuous echo of possible lessons behind it, proposing new ways of valuing oracy education and new possibilities for participation. Our chatty inquiry practices this ethics, overlapping our shared classroom experiences with discussions of theory and our discussions of theory with yet new possible experiences.

快乐的噪音和消减:闲言碎语和正统教育的下层
本文将黑人教育想象为一种与黑人研究中不可简化的社会性联系的延伸。在文化的帝国主义功能之后,课堂上的谈话已经被留下来捍卫其价值,反对传统主义的观点,正如一位英国教育部长所说的那样,谴责“课堂上的闲言碎语”。我们认为,如果在这一范围内衡量谈话的价值,那么oracy教育可能会使这种谴责所概述的价值体系——以及在其中被动员起来的白人殖民定居者/自我认识论——加倍下注。我们遵循黑人研究和关系诗学的底层,重新评估闲言碎语和噪音作为思维模式的价值。我们探索了噪音的丰富参与,超越了殖民地的减排任务,我们详细阐述了闲聊可能带来的关系风险。我们重新定位了学习对话的风险,将其单一的指导课程转变为充满活力的爵士式的学习杂音,在它后面留下了可能的课程的连续回声,提出了评估oracy教育的新方法和参与的新可能性。我们的闲聊式探究实践了这种伦理,将我们共同的课堂经验与理论讨论重叠,将我们的理论讨论与新的可能的经验重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Literacy
Literacy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Literacy is the official journal of the United Kingdom Literacy Association (formerly the United Kingdom Reading Association), the professional association for teachers of literacy. Literacy is a refereed journal for those interested in the study and development of literacy. Its readership comprises practitioners, teacher educators, researchers and both undergraduate and graduate students. Literacy offers educators a forum for debate through scrutinising research evidence, reflecting on analysed accounts of innovative practice and examining recent policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信