The Relationship Between Somatization and Depression Types: Comparison of Unipolar Depression and Bipolar Depression

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Erdoğdu Akça, Zeynep Nur DEMİROK AKÇA, M. Yıldız
{"title":"The Relationship Between Somatization and Depression Types: Comparison of Unipolar Depression and Bipolar Depression","authors":"Erdoğdu Akça, Zeynep Nur DEMİROK AKÇA, M. Yıldız","doi":"10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1181402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Somatic symptoms are more likely to be present in depression and anxiety, which causes to waste medical resources due to excessive hospital addmissions. It has been observed that the unclarity of qualitative and quantitative characteristics of somatization depending on the type of depression influences clinical practice less than expected. In the present study, it was aimed to determine the hallmarks of somatic symptoms in depression groups and to investigate the factors that might have an effect on somatic symptoms. \nMethod: One hundred consecutive patients (50 with Bipolar Depression (BD), 50 with Unipolar Depression (UD)) who met the criteria participated in the study. Patients were assessed for depressive symptoms with Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale and for somatic symptoms with Bradford Somatic Symptom Inventory. Clinical features were obtained by the clinician via Sociodemographic Data Form. \nResults: It was found that no significant difference in somatization characteristics between the depression groups. (p> .05). Somatic symptom severity was higher in the UD group in the presence of psychiatric comorbidity (p= .013), but not in BD. Another prominent finding was that the severity of depression was noted the only predictor of severe somatization. \nConclusion: The results show that increased somatic symptoms are associated with the severity of depression, suggesting treatment of depression with somatization rather than differential diagnosis should be primary concern.","PeriodicalId":10192,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1181402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Somatic symptoms are more likely to be present in depression and anxiety, which causes to waste medical resources due to excessive hospital addmissions. It has been observed that the unclarity of qualitative and quantitative characteristics of somatization depending on the type of depression influences clinical practice less than expected. In the present study, it was aimed to determine the hallmarks of somatic symptoms in depression groups and to investigate the factors that might have an effect on somatic symptoms. Method: One hundred consecutive patients (50 with Bipolar Depression (BD), 50 with Unipolar Depression (UD)) who met the criteria participated in the study. Patients were assessed for depressive symptoms with Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale and for somatic symptoms with Bradford Somatic Symptom Inventory. Clinical features were obtained by the clinician via Sociodemographic Data Form. Results: It was found that no significant difference in somatization characteristics between the depression groups. (p> .05). Somatic symptom severity was higher in the UD group in the presence of psychiatric comorbidity (p= .013), but not in BD. Another prominent finding was that the severity of depression was noted the only predictor of severe somatization. Conclusion: The results show that increased somatic symptoms are associated with the severity of depression, suggesting treatment of depression with somatization rather than differential diagnosis should be primary concern.
躯体化与抑郁类型的关系——单极性抑郁与双极性抑郁的比较
目的:躯体症状更容易出现在抑郁和焦虑中,这会导致医院过度扩张而浪费医疗资源。已经观察到,根据抑郁症的类型,躯体化的定性和定量特征的不确定性对临床实践的影响小于预期。在本研究中,旨在确定抑郁症患者躯体症状的特征,并调查可能影响躯体症状的因素。方法:100名符合标准的连续患者(50名患有双相抑郁症(BD),50名患有单极性抑郁症(UD))参与研究。使用Montgomery-Asberg抑郁量表评估患者的抑郁症状,并使用Bradford躯体症状量表评估其躯体症状。临床特征由临床医生通过社会形态数据表获得。结果:抑郁症组之间的躯体化特征没有显著差异。(p>0.05)。在存在精神共病的情况下,UD组的躯体症状严重程度更高(p=0.013),但在BD中没有。另一个突出的发现是,抑郁症的严重程度被认为是严重躯体化的唯一预测因素。结论:研究结果表明,躯体症状的增加与抑郁症的严重程度有关,提示应首先关注躯体化治疗抑郁症,而不是鉴别诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信