Principal Engagement in the Professional Development Process

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Koonce, John C. Pijanowski, Ed Bengtson, Kara Lasater
{"title":"Principal Engagement in the Professional Development Process","authors":"M. Koonce, John C. Pijanowski, Ed Bengtson, Kara Lasater","doi":"10.1177/0192636519871614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to identify factors that served as barriers to principal engagement in the professional development process, and identify what resources or supports were needed to increase engagement. The 249 survey participants were drawn from 112 different school systems. From that group 20 principals were purposefully sampled for interviews. The theoretical framework for this study drew from social cognitive, self-efficacy, and collective efficacy theories which served to frame school and district leaders’ roles in professional development.","PeriodicalId":39340,"journal":{"name":"NASSP Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0192636519871614","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NASSP Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636519871614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify factors that served as barriers to principal engagement in the professional development process, and identify what resources or supports were needed to increase engagement. The 249 survey participants were drawn from 112 different school systems. From that group 20 principals were purposefully sampled for interviews. The theoretical framework for this study drew from social cognitive, self-efficacy, and collective efficacy theories which served to frame school and district leaders’ roles in professional development.
专业发展过程中的主要参与
本研究的目的是确定阻碍主要参与专业发展过程的因素,并确定需要哪些资源或支持来提高参与度。249名调查参与者来自112个不同的学校系统。从这一组中,有目的地抽取了20名校长进行访谈。本研究的理论框架借鉴了社会认知、自我效能和集体效能理论,这些理论有助于界定学校和地区领导人在职业发展中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NASSP Bulletin
NASSP Bulletin Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信