On the Problem of the Population of the Crimea in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries and the First Wave of the Crimean Tatar Emigration

D. Konkin
{"title":"On the Problem of the Population of the Crimea in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries and the First Wave of the Crimean Tatar Emigration","authors":"D. Konkin","doi":"10.29039/2413-189x.2022.27.628-647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses disputable questions of statistis of the Crimean population on the eve and in the first decades after the annexation of the Crimea by the Russian Empire. These problems are of particular importance in connection with historiographical interpretations of the Crimean Tatar emigrations. The works of A. Ozenbashly, which are the most referred to in Western and Turkish historical scholarship, have been analysed in detail. The errors of his “million-strong” calculations of the population of the Crimea in this period have been uncovered. A similar analysis has been undertaken in case of modern article by N. S. Seitiag’iaev, who proposed a new argument for the over-estimated evaluation of the peninsula’s population. Moreover, we have also paid attention to the factual and logical mistakes and inconsistencies in the works of the first publishers of the Cameralistic Description of the Crimea A. A. Skal’kovskii and F. F. Lashkov, and in the 1793 account published by P. S. Pallas; these sources later became an important reason for misinterpretations of the demographic statistics of the Crimea in the scholarship. The conclusion uncovers the growth of the Tatar population in the Crimea after its incorporation into the Russian Empire. According to O. A. Igelstrom, in 1783 there were approximately 115,000 people, mostly Crimean Tatars, living in the Crimea. By 1795, the Crimean population was 157,600 (including 137,000 Crimean Tatars). In the very early nineteenth century, there were from 70,000 to 95,000 male Crimean Tatars according to different estimations, i. e. the minimal number was 130,000–140,000 both sexes. By 1816, this number increased to 182,700, and in 1850 it reached 267,400. Therefore, the conclusion of the global emigration of the Tatar population from the Crimea during the first decades of the Russian rule is not correct. Even 80,000 migrants could not leave the peninsula unnoticed and unrecorded after 1783. The main emigration flow of the late eighteenth century should be related to the pre-Russian period of the Crimean history, when internal struggle in the Crimean Khanate provoked by the Russian-Ottoman rivalry forced a great part of the local population to leave the peninsula.","PeriodicalId":41183,"journal":{"name":"Materialy po Arkheologii Istorii i Etnografii Tavrii-Materials in Archaeology History and Ethnography of Tauria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materialy po Arkheologii Istorii i Etnografii Tavrii-Materials in Archaeology History and Ethnography of Tauria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29039/2413-189x.2022.27.628-647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article addresses disputable questions of statistis of the Crimean population on the eve and in the first decades after the annexation of the Crimea by the Russian Empire. These problems are of particular importance in connection with historiographical interpretations of the Crimean Tatar emigrations. The works of A. Ozenbashly, which are the most referred to in Western and Turkish historical scholarship, have been analysed in detail. The errors of his “million-strong” calculations of the population of the Crimea in this period have been uncovered. A similar analysis has been undertaken in case of modern article by N. S. Seitiag’iaev, who proposed a new argument for the over-estimated evaluation of the peninsula’s population. Moreover, we have also paid attention to the factual and logical mistakes and inconsistencies in the works of the first publishers of the Cameralistic Description of the Crimea A. A. Skal’kovskii and F. F. Lashkov, and in the 1793 account published by P. S. Pallas; these sources later became an important reason for misinterpretations of the demographic statistics of the Crimea in the scholarship. The conclusion uncovers the growth of the Tatar population in the Crimea after its incorporation into the Russian Empire. According to O. A. Igelstrom, in 1783 there were approximately 115,000 people, mostly Crimean Tatars, living in the Crimea. By 1795, the Crimean population was 157,600 (including 137,000 Crimean Tatars). In the very early nineteenth century, there were from 70,000 to 95,000 male Crimean Tatars according to different estimations, i. e. the minimal number was 130,000–140,000 both sexes. By 1816, this number increased to 182,700, and in 1850 it reached 267,400. Therefore, the conclusion of the global emigration of the Tatar population from the Crimea during the first decades of the Russian rule is not correct. Even 80,000 migrants could not leave the peninsula unnoticed and unrecorded after 1783. The main emigration flow of the late eighteenth century should be related to the pre-Russian period of the Crimean history, when internal struggle in the Crimean Khanate provoked by the Russian-Ottoman rivalry forced a great part of the local population to leave the peninsula.
论18世纪末19世纪初克里米亚人口问题和克里米亚鞑靼人第一波移民潮
本文讨论了克里米亚被俄罗斯帝国吞并前夕和最初几十年的人口统计数据中有争议的问题。这些问题在对克里米亚鞑靼人移民的史学解释方面特别重要。本文详细分析了西方和土耳其历史学者中引用最多的A. Ozenbashly的作品。他在这一时期对克里米亚人口“百万之多”的计算错误已被揭露。一个类似的分析已经在n.s. Seitiag 'iaev的现代文章中进行,他提出了对半岛人口高估的新论点。此外,我们还注意了《克里米亚的摄影描述》的第一批出版商A. A.斯卡尔科夫斯基和F. F.拉什科夫的作品中事实和逻辑上的错误和不一致之处,以及1793年P. S.帕拉斯出版的叙述;这些资料后来成为学术界曲解克里米亚人口统计的重要原因。结论揭示了克里米亚并入俄罗斯帝国后鞑靼人口的增长。根据O. A.伊格尔斯特罗姆(O. A. Igelstrom)的说法,1783年,大约有11.5万人生活在克里米亚,其中大部分是克里米亚鞑靼人。到1795年,克里米亚人口为157,600人(包括137,000克里米亚鞑靼人)。在十九世纪早期,根据不同的估计,男性克里米亚鞑靼人有7万到9.5万人,即男女人数最少为13万到14万人。到1816年,这一数字增加到182700人,1850年达到267400人。因此,在俄罗斯统治的头几十年里,鞑靼人口从克里米亚全球移民的结论是不正确的。在1783年之后,即使是8万移民也无法不被注意和不被记录地离开半岛。18世纪后期的主要移民潮应该与克里米亚历史的前俄罗斯时期有关,当时克里米亚汗国的内部斗争由俄罗斯与奥斯曼帝国的竞争引发,迫使大部分当地人口离开半岛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信