Critical History, Subversion and Self-subversion: the Curious cases of Jean Mabillon and Richard Simon (II/II)

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Veronica Lazăr
{"title":"Critical History, Subversion and Self-subversion: the Curious cases of Jean Mabillon and Richard Simon (II/II)","authors":"Veronica Lazăr","doi":"10.24193/subbphil.2020.3.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Jean Mabillon and Richard Simon were both eminent seventeenth-century scholars who practiced contextualizing critical philology in order to forge unbeatable scientifical instruments against the skeptics and reinforce the authority of historical documents. But Simon’s work produced a mutation of the meaning of authenticity that would prove subversive and would generate outrage. His sociological and institutionalist understanding of the history of sacred texts not only merged both their production and their transmission into a common, ontologically homogenous historical process, but also included a survey of the sociological and cultural circumstances that transformed the text into a real authority. Furthermore, this anti-essentialist understanding of the gradual formation of the text allowed a positive reevaluation of the tradition as a continuous practice aiming at keeping alive an already historical truth.\n\nKey words: historical criticism, biblical hermeneutics, Richard Simon, Jean Mabillon, Spinoza \"","PeriodicalId":40516,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2020.3.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Jean Mabillon and Richard Simon were both eminent seventeenth-century scholars who practiced contextualizing critical philology in order to forge unbeatable scientifical instruments against the skeptics and reinforce the authority of historical documents. But Simon’s work produced a mutation of the meaning of authenticity that would prove subversive and would generate outrage. His sociological and institutionalist understanding of the history of sacred texts not only merged both their production and their transmission into a common, ontologically homogenous historical process, but also included a survey of the sociological and cultural circumstances that transformed the text into a real authority. Furthermore, this anti-essentialist understanding of the gradual formation of the text allowed a positive reevaluation of the tradition as a continuous practice aiming at keeping alive an already historical truth. Key words: historical criticism, biblical hermeneutics, Richard Simon, Jean Mabillon, Spinoza "
批判历史、颠覆与自我颠覆——简·马比隆与理查德·西蒙的奇事(II/II)
Jean Mabillon和Richard Simon都是17世纪著名的学者,他们将批判性文献学置于情境中,以打造无与伦比的科学工具来对抗怀疑论者,并加强历史文献的权威性。但Simon的工作对真实性的含义产生了突变,这将被证明是颠覆性的,并会引起愤怒制度主义者对神圣文本历史的理解不仅将其产生和传播融合成一个共同的、本体同质的历史过程,而且还包括对将文本转变为真正权威的社会学和文化环境的调查。此外,这种对文本逐渐形成的反本质主义理解允许对传统进行积极的重新评估,将其视为一种旨在保持已经存在的历史真理的持续实践。关键词:历史批判、圣经解释学、理查德·西蒙、让·马比隆、斯宾诺莎”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信