{"title":"Refutatory na-sentences in Mandarin Chinese","authors":"C. Liu","doi":"10.1075/ijchl.21001.liu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Refutatory na-sentences possess several syntactic properties that are absent in their\n interrogative counterparts. First, they carry the assertive rather than interrogative force; second, they are mainly used to\n refute a claim made by another interlocutor. Given the fact that such a distinction is correlated with the position that\n na ‘where’ occupies in sentence, I propose that when na serves as an interrogative\n wh-phrase, it is nominal and consists of na and an indefinite morpheme concerning location;\n in contrast, when na is a refutatory marker, it is an adjunct, containing an additional negative operator that\n binds a location-associated variable encoded in the indefinite morpheme. The refutatory na further has to move to\n the Spec of ForceP at LF to acquire the illocutionary force. This analysis not only accounts for the syntactic and pragmatic\n properties of the refutatory na, but also supports the claim that Mandarin wh-arguments and\n wh-adjuncts are formed differently.","PeriodicalId":41020,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.21001.liu","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Refutatory na-sentences possess several syntactic properties that are absent in their
interrogative counterparts. First, they carry the assertive rather than interrogative force; second, they are mainly used to
refute a claim made by another interlocutor. Given the fact that such a distinction is correlated with the position that
na ‘where’ occupies in sentence, I propose that when na serves as an interrogative
wh-phrase, it is nominal and consists of na and an indefinite morpheme concerning location;
in contrast, when na is a refutatory marker, it is an adjunct, containing an additional negative operator that
binds a location-associated variable encoded in the indefinite morpheme. The refutatory na further has to move to
the Spec of ForceP at LF to acquire the illocutionary force. This analysis not only accounts for the syntactic and pragmatic
properties of the refutatory na, but also supports the claim that Mandarin wh-arguments and
wh-adjuncts are formed differently.