Refutatory na-sentences in Mandarin Chinese

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
C. Liu
{"title":"Refutatory na-sentences in Mandarin Chinese","authors":"C. Liu","doi":"10.1075/ijchl.21001.liu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Refutatory na-sentences possess several syntactic properties that are absent in their\n interrogative counterparts. First, they carry the assertive rather than interrogative force; second, they are mainly used to\n refute a claim made by another interlocutor. Given the fact that such a distinction is correlated with the position that\n na ‘where’ occupies in sentence, I propose that when na serves as an interrogative\n wh-phrase, it is nominal and consists of na and an indefinite morpheme concerning location;\n in contrast, when na is a refutatory marker, it is an adjunct, containing an additional negative operator that\n binds a location-associated variable encoded in the indefinite morpheme. The refutatory na further has to move to\n the Spec of ForceP at LF to acquire the illocutionary force. This analysis not only accounts for the syntactic and pragmatic\n properties of the refutatory na, but also supports the claim that Mandarin wh-arguments and\n wh-adjuncts are formed differently.","PeriodicalId":41020,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.21001.liu","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Refutatory na-sentences possess several syntactic properties that are absent in their interrogative counterparts. First, they carry the assertive rather than interrogative force; second, they are mainly used to refute a claim made by another interlocutor. Given the fact that such a distinction is correlated with the position that na ‘where’ occupies in sentence, I propose that when na serves as an interrogative wh-phrase, it is nominal and consists of na and an indefinite morpheme concerning location; in contrast, when na is a refutatory marker, it is an adjunct, containing an additional negative operator that binds a location-associated variable encoded in the indefinite morpheme. The refutatory na further has to move to the Spec of ForceP at LF to acquire the illocutionary force. This analysis not only accounts for the syntactic and pragmatic properties of the refutatory na, but also supports the claim that Mandarin wh-arguments and wh-adjuncts are formed differently.
汉语中的否定句
反语na句具有疑问句所没有的几种句法性质。首先,他们带有自信而非疑问的力量;其次,它们主要用于反驳另一个对话者的主张。鉴于这种区别与na“where”在句子中的位置有关,我认为当na作为疑问wh短语时,它是名词性的,由na和一个关于位置的不定词素组成;相反,当na是一个反驳标记时,它是一个附加词,包含一个额外的负算子,它绑定了编码在不定词素中的位置相关变量。反驳者na必须进一步进入LF的力量规范,以获得言外力量。这一分析不仅解释了反驳者na的句法和语用特性,而且支持了普通话wh自变量和wh附加词形成不同的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信