The Relational Approach and Social Epistemology in Educational Leadership: A Rejoinder

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Scott Eacott
{"title":"The Relational Approach and Social Epistemology in Educational Leadership: A Rejoinder","authors":"Scott Eacott","doi":"10.30828/REAL/2019.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calls for a social epistemology in educational administration and leadership are not new. As a field of inquiry, parallel monologues have come to dominate scholarly outlets and forums. But, parallel monologues arguably violate the logic of academic work – argument and refutation – with significant implications for the rigor and robustness of knowledge claims. This Special Issue sought to provide a forum for sustained dialogue and debate on the problems and possibilities of the relational approach that I am advancing. As the concluding paper, and a rejoinder to the contributions, here I highlight the difficulties of generating dialogue and debate and how going beyond our own complicity is challenging, but arguably rewarding, academic work","PeriodicalId":41311,"journal":{"name":"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30828/REAL/2019.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Calls for a social epistemology in educational administration and leadership are not new. As a field of inquiry, parallel monologues have come to dominate scholarly outlets and forums. But, parallel monologues arguably violate the logic of academic work – argument and refutation – with significant implications for the rigor and robustness of knowledge claims. This Special Issue sought to provide a forum for sustained dialogue and debate on the problems and possibilities of the relational approach that I am advancing. As the concluding paper, and a rejoinder to the contributions, here I highlight the difficulties of generating dialogue and debate and how going beyond our own complicity is challenging, but arguably rewarding, academic work
教育领导中的关系方法与社会认识论:再答
在教育管理和领导中呼唤社会认识论并不是什么新鲜事。作为一个研究领域,平行独白已经主导了学术渠道和论坛。但是,平行独白可以说违反了学术工作的逻辑——论证和反驳——对知识主张的严谨性和稳健性有着重要的影响。本期特刊旨在提供一个论坛,就我所提出的关系方法的问题和可能性进行持续对话和辩论。作为结论性论文,以及对这些贡献的回应,我在这里强调了产生对话和辩论的困难,以及如何超越我们自己的共谋是具有挑战性的,但可以说是有益的,学术工作
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Educational Administration & Leadership
Research in Educational Administration & Leadership EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信