Electroacupuncture for Knee Osteoarthritis Based on Different Meridian Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Tian-Qi Wang, Wan-Ting Lu, Jia Yang
{"title":"Electroacupuncture for Knee Osteoarthritis Based on Different Meridian Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial","authors":"Tian-Qi Wang, Wan-Ting Lu, Jia Yang","doi":"10.3727/036012921X16207330235374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We aimed to explore the feasibility of evaluating effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) based on different meridian syndromes. Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted in Beijing\n from January 2019 to December 2019. Sixty KOA participants were randomly allocated to either EA (n=30) or SA (n=30) groups. Participants in EA group were treated with semi-standardized on different meridian syndrome, including five obligatory acupoints and three adjunct acupoints. Eight non-acupoints\n that were separated from conventional acupoints or meridians were used for the SA group. Both groups received 24 sessions within eight weeks. The primary outcome was response rate, defined as a change of ≥50% from baseline in total scores of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis\n index (WOMAC) at the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included function, pain, stiffness, quality of life and acupuncture-related adverse events at four and eight weeks. Results: Of 60 participants randomized, 56 (93.3%) completed the study. Response rates were 60% for the EA group\n and 30% for the SA group after eight weeks. Significant differences were observed in WOMAC pain and total scores within two groups (P =0.026, P =0.043). Rates of adverse events were low and similarly distributed between groups. Conclusion: EA intervention based on meridian\n differentiation in KOA was feasible and appeared safe, having a stronger impact on pain than SA. Future studies can be designed with larger sample size, adequately powered, randomization design and less biases. Trial registration number: NCT03274713.","PeriodicalId":50881,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3727/036012921X16207330235374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to explore the feasibility of evaluating effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) based on different meridian syndromes. Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted in Beijing from January 2019 to December 2019. Sixty KOA participants were randomly allocated to either EA (n=30) or SA (n=30) groups. Participants in EA group were treated with semi-standardized on different meridian syndrome, including five obligatory acupoints and three adjunct acupoints. Eight non-acupoints that were separated from conventional acupoints or meridians were used for the SA group. Both groups received 24 sessions within eight weeks. The primary outcome was response rate, defined as a change of ≥50% from baseline in total scores of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) at the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included function, pain, stiffness, quality of life and acupuncture-related adverse events at four and eight weeks. Results: Of 60 participants randomized, 56 (93.3%) completed the study. Response rates were 60% for the EA group and 30% for the SA group after eight weeks. Significant differences were observed in WOMAC pain and total scores within two groups (P =0.026, P =0.043). Rates of adverse events were low and similarly distributed between groups. Conclusion: EA intervention based on meridian differentiation in KOA was feasible and appeared safe, having a stronger impact on pain than SA. Future studies can be designed with larger sample size, adequately powered, randomization design and less biases. Trial registration number: NCT03274713.
电针治疗不同经络证型膝骨关节炎的随机对照试验
背景:我们旨在探讨根据不同经络综合征评估电针治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)的有效性和安全性的可行性。方法:2019年1月至2019年12月在北京进行多中心随机对照试验。60名KOA参与者被随机分配到EA组(n=30)或SA组(n=30)。电针组采用半标准化治疗不同经络证候,包括五个强制性穴位和三个附属穴位。SA组采用8个与常规穴位或经络分离的非穴位。两组均在8周内接受了24次治疗。主要结果是有效率,定义为治疗结束时西安大略大学和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)总分与基线相比变化≥50%。次要结果包括功能、疼痛、僵硬、生活质量以及第四周和第八周的针灸相关不良事件。结果:在随机分组的60名参与者中,56人(93.3%)完成了研究。8周后,电针组和SA组的有效率分别为60%和30%。两组内WOMAC疼痛和总分存在显著差异(P=0.026,P=0.043)。不良事件发生率较低,各组间分布相似。结论:基于经络分化的电针干预KOA是可行的,而且看起来是安全的,对疼痛的影响比SA更强。未来的研究可以设计更大的样本量、足够的动力、随机化设计和更少的偏差。试验注册号:NCT03274713。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research
Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
66.70%
发文量
9
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide an international forum for the exchange of ideas and promotion of basic and clinical research in acupuncture, electro-therapeutics, and related fields. The journal was established in order to make acupuncture and electro-therapeutics a universally acceptable branch of medicine through multidisciplinary research based on scientific disciplines. The final goal is to provide a better understanding of both the beneficial and adverse effects of these treatments in order to supplement or improve existing methods of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases in both Western and Oriental medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信