Role of Inferior Vena Cava Parameters as Predictors of Fluid Responsiveness in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Prospective Study

IF 0.3 Q4 PEDIATRICS
A. El-Nawawy, O. Omar, H. Hassouna
{"title":"Role of Inferior Vena Cava Parameters as Predictors of Fluid Responsiveness in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Prospective Study","authors":"A. El-Nawawy, O. Omar, H. Hassouna","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1724034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Fluid resuscitation is the initial therapy for septic shock worldwide. Prediction of fluid responsiveness is essential for optimizing fluid administration. Only few pediatric studies have evaluated the role of inferior vena cava (IVC) as a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of IVC parameters as predictors of fluid responsiveness in children (under the age of 5 years) having septic shock at different times from admission. A prospective observational study included 51 children having septic shock. It was conducted in the nine-bedded pediatric intensive care unit of a university hospital from January 1, 2018, to the August 31, 2018. Echocardiography was used to assess minimal and maximal IVC diameters and its distensibility index with simultaneous assessment of stroke volume (SV), at 1, 6, and 24 hours from admission. The decision to give fluid in these children was thereby based on the presence of at least one sign of inadequate tissue perfusion. SV was reassessed directly after administration of a fluid bolus of 10 mL/kg over 10 minutes. Fluid responsiveness was considered adequate when there was ≥ 10% increase in SV after fluid bolus. Minimal IVC diameter indexed to body surface area and its distensibility index can be predictors of fluid responsiveness at all times: 1 hour (area under curve [AUC] = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77–0.96), 6 hours (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.67–0.97), and 24 hours (AUC = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.6–0.95). IVC distensibility index can also predict fluid responsiveness at 1 hour (AUC= 0.87; 95% CI = 0.74–0.95), 6 hours (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.73–0.94), and 24 hours (AUC = 1; 95% CI = 0.77–1). The cutoff points of each parameter differed from time to time (contradicts with previous statement that says it is predictor at all times). The maximum IVC diameter could not predict fluid responsiveness at any time from admission. Minimal IVC diameter and its distensibility index were feasible noninvasive surrogates of fluid responsiveness in pediatric septic shock at different times from admission.","PeriodicalId":41283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1724034","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1724034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Fluid resuscitation is the initial therapy for septic shock worldwide. Prediction of fluid responsiveness is essential for optimizing fluid administration. Only few pediatric studies have evaluated the role of inferior vena cava (IVC) as a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of IVC parameters as predictors of fluid responsiveness in children (under the age of 5 years) having septic shock at different times from admission. A prospective observational study included 51 children having septic shock. It was conducted in the nine-bedded pediatric intensive care unit of a university hospital from January 1, 2018, to the August 31, 2018. Echocardiography was used to assess minimal and maximal IVC diameters and its distensibility index with simultaneous assessment of stroke volume (SV), at 1, 6, and 24 hours from admission. The decision to give fluid in these children was thereby based on the presence of at least one sign of inadequate tissue perfusion. SV was reassessed directly after administration of a fluid bolus of 10 mL/kg over 10 minutes. Fluid responsiveness was considered adequate when there was ≥ 10% increase in SV after fluid bolus. Minimal IVC diameter indexed to body surface area and its distensibility index can be predictors of fluid responsiveness at all times: 1 hour (area under curve [AUC] = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77–0.96), 6 hours (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.67–0.97), and 24 hours (AUC = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.6–0.95). IVC distensibility index can also predict fluid responsiveness at 1 hour (AUC= 0.87; 95% CI = 0.74–0.95), 6 hours (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.73–0.94), and 24 hours (AUC = 1; 95% CI = 0.77–1). The cutoff points of each parameter differed from time to time (contradicts with previous statement that says it is predictor at all times). The maximum IVC diameter could not predict fluid responsiveness at any time from admission. Minimal IVC diameter and its distensibility index were feasible noninvasive surrogates of fluid responsiveness in pediatric septic shock at different times from admission.
下腔静脉参数作为儿童败血症休克液体反应性预测指标的作用:一项前瞻性研究
摘要液体复苏是世界范围内感染性休克的初步治疗方法。流体反应性的预测对于优化流体给药至关重要。只有少数儿科研究评估了下腔静脉(IVC)作为液体反应性可靠预测指标的作用。本研究的目的是评估IVC参数在入院后不同时间感染性休克儿童(5岁以下)中作为液体反应性预测因素的作用。一项前瞻性观察性研究包括51名感染性休克儿童。该研究于2018年1月1日至2018年8月31日在一所大学医院的九床儿科重症监护室进行。超声心动图用于评估最小和最大IVC直径及其扩张性指数,同时评估1、6和24时的搏出量(SV) 入院后数小时。因此,给这些儿童输液的决定是基于至少一种组织灌注不足的迹象的存在。在给药10次液体推注后直接重新评估SV mL/kg超过10 分钟当液体推注后SV增加≥10%时,液体反应性被认为是足够的。以体表面积为指标的最小IVC直径及其扩张性指数可以随时预测液体反应性:1小时(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.88;95%置信区间 = 0.77–0.96),6 小时(AUC = 0.86;95%CI = 0.67–0.97)和24 小时(AUC = 0.77;95%CI = 0.6–0.95)。IVC扩张指数也可以预测1小时时的液体反应性(AUC=0.87;95%CI = 0.74–0.95),6 小时(AUC = 0.86;95%CI = 0.73–0.94)和24 小时(AUC = 1.95%CI = 0.77–1)。每个参数的截止点不时不同(与之前的说法相矛盾,即它在任何时候都是预测因子)。IVC的最大直径不能预测入院后任何时候的液体反应性。最小IVC直径及其扩张指数是儿科感染性休克患者入院后不同时间液体反应性的可行非侵入性替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信