Development and evaluation of an acceptance-facilitating intervention for an internet-based cognitive behavioral self-esteem training for adults with body dysmorphic symptoms

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Katharina Bosbach, Katrin Schoenenberg, Alexandra Martin
{"title":"Development and evaluation of an acceptance-facilitating intervention for an internet-based cognitive behavioral self-esteem training for adults with body dysmorphic symptoms","authors":"Katharina Bosbach,&nbsp;Katrin Schoenenberg,&nbsp;Alexandra Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Various barriers contribute to low treatment rates in </span>Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD). While internet-based intervention is considered a low-threshold option and shows efficacy, studies report acceptance deficits. We first tested predictors of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology for acceptance and secondly evaluated an acceptance-facilitating intervention for an internet-based self-esteem training addressed to individuals with BDD symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We randomly assigned 110 participants with distinct BDD symptoms to a 6-min animated whiteboard video (<em>n</em> = 50) or a waiting control group (<em>n</em> = 60) before offering them internet-based training.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Acceptance was good before the intervention (87% with moderate/high scores). Performance expectancy, social influence and slightly effort expectancy predicted baseline acceptance (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.70). The acceptance-facilitating intervention led to greater improvements of performance expectancy and facilitating conditions compared to the control group. Higher self-reported acceptance was associated with training uptake and higher adherence.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>In particular, performance expectancy, but also social influence seemed to be valid predictors of acceptance of web-based BDD treatment. The results suggest that a specifically designed, brief video improves acceptance-facilitating factors. Subject to review, the potential benefit of an acceptance-facilitating intervention may be to enhance treatment rates in BDD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364923000192","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Various barriers contribute to low treatment rates in Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD). While internet-based intervention is considered a low-threshold option and shows efficacy, studies report acceptance deficits. We first tested predictors of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology for acceptance and secondly evaluated an acceptance-facilitating intervention for an internet-based self-esteem training addressed to individuals with BDD symptoms.

Method

We randomly assigned 110 participants with distinct BDD symptoms to a 6-min animated whiteboard video (n = 50) or a waiting control group (n = 60) before offering them internet-based training.

Results

Acceptance was good before the intervention (87% with moderate/high scores). Performance expectancy, social influence and slightly effort expectancy predicted baseline acceptance (R2 = 0.70). The acceptance-facilitating intervention led to greater improvements of performance expectancy and facilitating conditions compared to the control group. Higher self-reported acceptance was associated with training uptake and higher adherence.

Discussion

In particular, performance expectancy, but also social influence seemed to be valid predictors of acceptance of web-based BDD treatment. The results suggest that a specifically designed, brief video improves acceptance-facilitating factors. Subject to review, the potential benefit of an acceptance-facilitating intervention may be to enhance treatment rates in BDD.

基于网络的成人身体畸形症状认知行为自尊训练的接受促进干预的发展与评价
背景各种障碍导致身体变形障碍(BDD)的治疗率低。虽然基于互联网的干预被认为是一种低门槛的选择,并且显示出有效性,但研究报告称接受度不足。我们首先测试了接受和技术使用统一理论的预测因子,然后评估了针对BDD症状个体的基于互联网的自尊训练的接受促进干预。方法我们将110名有不同BDD症状的参与者随机分配到一个6分钟的白板动画视频组(n=50)或一个等待的对照组(n=60),然后为他们提供基于互联网的培训。结果干预前接受度良好(87%为中/高分)。绩效预期、社会影响和轻度努力预期预测了基线接受度(R2=0.70)。与对照组相比,促进接受的干预措施使绩效预期和促进条件有了更大的改善。更高的自我报告接受度与训练的接受度和更高的依从性相关。讨论特别是,表现预期以及社会影响似乎是接受基于网络的BDD治疗的有效预测因素。研究结果表明,一个专门设计的简短视频提高了接受的便利因素。根据审查,促进接受干预的潜在好处可能是提高BDD的治疗率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信