The Heterogeneity of Social Network and Institutional Covariance in the American Southeast

IF 2.7 1区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Jacob Holland-Lulewicz
{"title":"The Heterogeneity of Social Network and Institutional Covariance in the American Southeast","authors":"Jacob Holland-Lulewicz","doi":"10.1017/aaq.2023.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Social, political, and economic institutions covary with one another in heterogenous ways across space and time. Social Network Analysis (SNA) offers a set of analytical tools and conceptual frameworks that have allowed for formal comparisons of interactions, affiliations, and relationships in reconstructing historical trajectories of institutional change. Although archaeologists have made full use of a range of metrics that describe the structural variation of social networks, formal approaches to analyzing the covariance of networks, and the institutions that structured networks in the past, remain undertheorized. In most cases, descriptive metrics are compared between networks built from different datasets or networks separated in time. Using quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) correlations to compare matrices of archaeological data, I draw on a ceramic dataset of approximately 350,000 sherds from the Southern Appalachian region to investigate how decisions related to manufacture choice and to stylistic design covaried with one another between roughly AD 800 and 1650. I explore how material attributes may or may not vary independently of one another and what that means for our analyses of the institutions they reflect. The results contribute to broader comparative analyses of institutional change and perennial discussions of social evolution.","PeriodicalId":7424,"journal":{"name":"American Antiquity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2023.52","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social, political, and economic institutions covary with one another in heterogenous ways across space and time. Social Network Analysis (SNA) offers a set of analytical tools and conceptual frameworks that have allowed for formal comparisons of interactions, affiliations, and relationships in reconstructing historical trajectories of institutional change. Although archaeologists have made full use of a range of metrics that describe the structural variation of social networks, formal approaches to analyzing the covariance of networks, and the institutions that structured networks in the past, remain undertheorized. In most cases, descriptive metrics are compared between networks built from different datasets or networks separated in time. Using quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) correlations to compare matrices of archaeological data, I draw on a ceramic dataset of approximately 350,000 sherds from the Southern Appalachian region to investigate how decisions related to manufacture choice and to stylistic design covaried with one another between roughly AD 800 and 1650. I explore how material attributes may or may not vary independently of one another and what that means for our analyses of the institutions they reflect. The results contribute to broader comparative analyses of institutional change and perennial discussions of social evolution.
美国东南部社会网络的异质性与制度变异
社会、政治和经济机构在空间和时间上以异质的方式相互交织。社会网络分析(SNA)提供了一套分析工具和概念框架,允许在重建制度变革的历史轨迹时对互动、隶属关系和关系进行正式比较。尽管考古学家已经充分利用了一系列描述社会网络结构变化的指标,但分析网络协方差的正式方法,以及过去构建网络的机构,仍然缺乏理论基础。在大多数情况下,在从不同数据集构建的网络或在时间上分离的网络之间比较描述性度量。使用二次分配程序(QAP)相关性来比较考古数据矩阵,我利用阿巴拉契亚南部地区约350000块碎片的陶瓷数据集,调查大约在公元800年至1650年间,与制造选择和风格设计相关的决策是如何相互变化的。我探讨了物质属性如何独立变化,以及这对我们分析它们所反映的制度意味着什么。研究结果有助于对制度变革进行更广泛的比较分析,并有助于长期讨论社会演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Antiquity
American Antiquity Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
95
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信