Operation Buckshot: Churchill’s Forgotten Offensive against Rommel, March-May 1942

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
M. Samuels
{"title":"Operation Buckshot: Churchill’s Forgotten Offensive against Rommel, March-May 1942","authors":"M. Samuels","doi":"10.1080/07292473.2023.2178109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although much has been written about the arguments between Churchill and Auchinleck over when Eighth Army should move over to the offensive in the spring of 1942, the plans for that offensive have been almost entirely overlooked in the literature. Drawing on the records in the archives, and on Auchinleck’s personal correspondence, reveals a planning process characterised by disagreements between the senior officers involved, a lack of urgency, and a flawed operational concept.","PeriodicalId":43656,"journal":{"name":"War & Society","volume":"42 1","pages":"178 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07292473.2023.2178109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although much has been written about the arguments between Churchill and Auchinleck over when Eighth Army should move over to the offensive in the spring of 1942, the plans for that offensive have been almost entirely overlooked in the literature. Drawing on the records in the archives, and on Auchinleck’s personal correspondence, reveals a planning process characterised by disagreements between the senior officers involved, a lack of urgency, and a flawed operational concept.
七叶树行动:丘吉尔对隆美尔被遗忘的进攻,1942年3月至5月
尽管关于丘吉尔和奥金莱克之间关于第八军何时应该在1942年春天开始进攻的争论已经写了很多文章,但那次进攻的计划在文献中几乎完全被忽视了。根据档案中的记录和Auchinleck的个人信件,揭示了一个规划过程,其特点是相关高级官员之间存在分歧、缺乏紧迫性和有缺陷的作战概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
War & Society
War & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信