Introduction to the Special Issue on “Territorial Resilience: Mitigation and Firms’ Adaptation”

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Raúl Ramos, Vicente Royuela
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on “Territorial Resilience: Mitigation and Firms’ Adaptation”","authors":"Raúl Ramos, Vicente Royuela","doi":"10.1177/0160017620975083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The depth of the Great Recession in the developed world had a major impact on the daily life of millions of people. It also brought a new way of seeing the response of economic actors. From a territorial point of view, the concept of Resilience came to a forefront. We can see several examples on this. A simple search in the Scopus database with the words “Regional Resilience” returns more than 170 entries in the Social Sciences area published during the last 10 years. Several academic journals have devoted Special Issues to the topic, being particularly influential the special issue on the “Resilient Region” of the Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economics and Society published in 2010, disseminating the concept of resilience across regional scientists. Single papers have also had a wide audience: the paper by Simmie and Martin (2010) has received nearly 600 citations according to Scopus and more than 1,200 in Google Scholar, while Christopherson, Michie, and Tyler (2010) or Hassink (2020) have also received considerable attention in terms of citations. Many works have identified territorial Resilience as a challenge for research and policy (van Dijk and Edzes 2016), and the research has expanded exponentially addressing both conceptual and measurement issues and applications in different settings. Different meta-analytic reviews have also been published (see, for instance, Sedita, de Noni, and Pilotti 2017 or Lazzaroni and van Bergeijk 2014). As highlighted by Briston and Healy (2020), “part of the richness of the literature","PeriodicalId":51507,"journal":{"name":"International Regional Science Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"3 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0160017620975083","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Regional Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620975083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The depth of the Great Recession in the developed world had a major impact on the daily life of millions of people. It also brought a new way of seeing the response of economic actors. From a territorial point of view, the concept of Resilience came to a forefront. We can see several examples on this. A simple search in the Scopus database with the words “Regional Resilience” returns more than 170 entries in the Social Sciences area published during the last 10 years. Several academic journals have devoted Special Issues to the topic, being particularly influential the special issue on the “Resilient Region” of the Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economics and Society published in 2010, disseminating the concept of resilience across regional scientists. Single papers have also had a wide audience: the paper by Simmie and Martin (2010) has received nearly 600 citations according to Scopus and more than 1,200 in Google Scholar, while Christopherson, Michie, and Tyler (2010) or Hassink (2020) have also received considerable attention in terms of citations. Many works have identified territorial Resilience as a challenge for research and policy (van Dijk and Edzes 2016), and the research has expanded exponentially addressing both conceptual and measurement issues and applications in different settings. Different meta-analytic reviews have also been published (see, for instance, Sedita, de Noni, and Pilotti 2017 or Lazzaroni and van Bergeijk 2014). As highlighted by Briston and Healy (2020), “part of the richness of the literature
“领土弹性:缓解和企业适应”特刊简介
发达国家大衰退的严重程度对数百万人的日常生活产生了重大影响。它还带来了一种看待经济行为体反应的新方式。从领土的角度来看,复原力的概念走到了最前沿。我们可以看到几个例子。在Scopus数据库中用“区域复原力”一词进行简单搜索,就会返回过去10年中在社会科学领域发表的170多个条目。一些学术期刊专门出版了《特刊》来讨论这一主题,特别有影响力的是2010年出版的《剑桥地区、经济和社会杂志》关于“韧性地区”的特刊,该特刊在地区科学家中传播了韧性的概念。单个论文也有广泛的受众:根据Scopus的数据,Simmie和Martin(2010)的论文获得了近600次引用,在谷歌学者中获得了1200多次引用,而Christopherson、Michie和Tyler(2010)或Hassink(2020)的论文在引用方面也受到了相当大的关注。许多工作已经将领土复原力确定为研究和政策的挑战(van Dijk和Edzes,2016年),该研究已呈指数级扩展,涉及概念和测量问题以及在不同环境中的应用。也发表了不同的元分析评论(例如,见Sedita、de Noni和Pilotti 2017或Lazzaroni和van Bergeijk 2014)。正如Briston和Healy(2020)所强调的,“文学丰富性的一部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
13.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: International Regional Science Review serves as an international forum for economists, geographers, planners, and other social scientists to share important research findings and methodological breakthroughs. The journal serves as a catalyst for improving spatial and regional analysis within the social sciences and stimulating communication among the disciplines. IRSR deliberately helps define regional science by publishing key interdisciplinary survey articles that summarize and evaluate previous research and identify fruitful research directions. Focusing on issues of theory, method, and public policy where the spatial or regional dimension is central, IRSR strives to promote useful scholarly research that is securely tied to the real world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信