Gender, Institutional Inequality, and Institutional Diversity in Archaeology Articles in Major Journals and Sapiens

IF 2.7 1区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Scott R. Hutson, James Johnson, S. Price, Dorian Record, Marcus Rodriguez, Taylor Snow, Tera Stocking
{"title":"Gender, Institutional Inequality, and Institutional Diversity in Archaeology Articles in Major Journals and Sapiens","authors":"Scott R. Hutson, James Johnson, S. Price, Dorian Record, Marcus Rodriguez, Taylor Snow, Tera Stocking","doi":"10.1017/aaq.2023.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Studies in the sociopolitics of archaeology have shown patterns of inequality in publishing. Because this inequality affects the richness of perspectives on the past, the extent of unevenness requires continual documentation. This article explores gendered and institutionally based patterns of authorship in prominent archaeology journals, archaeology papers in general science journals, and Sapiens, a public-facing web magazine, from 2016 to 2021. We find that the representation of women is similar across these two types of journals, for authors both in the United States and abroad. Men still publish significantly more than women though the gap is narrowing due to the publication activity of recent PhDs. Using a large database of PhDs as a baseline for comparison, we find that women publish less in these venues than expected, resulting in an imbalance. Some archaeology programs have a larger presence in journal publishing than others, but this imbalance is not as pervasive as what has been observed in hiring practices. Archaeology journals exhibit healthier measures of diversity, compared to Science, in terms of the institutional affiliation of authors.","PeriodicalId":7424,"journal":{"name":"American Antiquity","volume":"88 1","pages":"326 - 343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2023.36","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Studies in the sociopolitics of archaeology have shown patterns of inequality in publishing. Because this inequality affects the richness of perspectives on the past, the extent of unevenness requires continual documentation. This article explores gendered and institutionally based patterns of authorship in prominent archaeology journals, archaeology papers in general science journals, and Sapiens, a public-facing web magazine, from 2016 to 2021. We find that the representation of women is similar across these two types of journals, for authors both in the United States and abroad. Men still publish significantly more than women though the gap is narrowing due to the publication activity of recent PhDs. Using a large database of PhDs as a baseline for comparison, we find that women publish less in these venues than expected, resulting in an imbalance. Some archaeology programs have a larger presence in journal publishing than others, but this imbalance is not as pervasive as what has been observed in hiring practices. Archaeology journals exhibit healthier measures of diversity, compared to Science, in terms of the institutional affiliation of authors.
性别、制度不平等与制度多样性——主要期刊和Sapiens考古文章
摘要考古社会政治学研究表明,出版业存在不平等现象。由于这种不平等影响了对过去观点的丰富性,不平等的程度需要不断的记录。本文探讨了2016年至2021年著名考古期刊、普通科学期刊上的考古论文和面向公众的网络杂志《Sapiens》中基于性别和制度的作者模式。我们发现,对于美国和国外的作者来说,这两种类型的期刊中女性的代表性是相似的。尽管由于最近博士的出版活动,这一差距正在缩小,但男性的出版数量仍明显多于女性。使用一个大型博士数据库作为比较基准,我们发现女性在这些场所发表的论文比预期的要少,这导致了不平衡。一些考古项目在期刊出版中的影响力比其他项目大,但这种不平衡并不像招聘实践中观察到的那样普遍。就作者的机构隶属关系而言,与《科学》杂志相比,《考古》杂志展现了更健康的多样性衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Antiquity
American Antiquity Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
95
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信