Recharting the history of economic thought: approaches to and student experiences of the introduction of pluralist teaching in an undergraduate economics curriculum
{"title":"Recharting the history of economic thought: approaches to and student experiences of the introduction of pluralist teaching in an undergraduate economics curriculum","authors":"K. Deane, E. V. Waeyenberge, Rachel Maxwell","doi":"10.1504/IJPEE.2019.101724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The student movement calling for the introduction of pluralist and heterodox economics teaching in higher education presents a unique set of challenges for those who want to incorporate different economic approaches into their teaching. This paper outlines an innovative redesign of a course on the History of Economic Thought, which acted as a vehicle for exposing students to different theoretical traditions and engaging them in critical reflections on mainstream economics. It also presents findings from a research project conducted with economics students at the University of Northampton that aimed to understand their experiences of the redesign. We reflect on the pedagogical challenges highlighted by students and the implications this has for (re)designing the economics curriculum. Our findings challenge arguments commonly deployed against the introduction of pluralist teaching. These include the notions that there is no appetite for this in the broader student population, that students would fail to engage with such an approach, that they fear a negative impact on their employability and that alternative economic approaches should only be introduced at an advanced level.","PeriodicalId":52200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJPEE.2019.101724","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPEE.2019.101724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The student movement calling for the introduction of pluralist and heterodox economics teaching in higher education presents a unique set of challenges for those who want to incorporate different economic approaches into their teaching. This paper outlines an innovative redesign of a course on the History of Economic Thought, which acted as a vehicle for exposing students to different theoretical traditions and engaging them in critical reflections on mainstream economics. It also presents findings from a research project conducted with economics students at the University of Northampton that aimed to understand their experiences of the redesign. We reflect on the pedagogical challenges highlighted by students and the implications this has for (re)designing the economics curriculum. Our findings challenge arguments commonly deployed against the introduction of pluralist teaching. These include the notions that there is no appetite for this in the broader student population, that students would fail to engage with such an approach, that they fear a negative impact on their employability and that alternative economic approaches should only be introduced at an advanced level.
学生运动呼吁在高等教育中引入多元和非正统的经济学教学,这给那些想要将不同的经济学方法纳入教学的人带来了一系列独特的挑战。本文概述了对经济思想史课程的创新重新设计,该课程作为一种工具,使学生接触不同的理论传统,并使他们对主流经济学进行批判性反思。它还介绍了与北安普顿大学(University of Northampton)经济学专业学生进行的一项研究项目的结果,该项目旨在了解他们对重新设计的体验。我们反思了学生强调的教学挑战,以及这对(重新)设计经济学课程的影响。我们的发现挑战了通常反对引入多元教学的论点。这些观点包括:在更广泛的学生群体中没有这种兴趣,学生们不会参与这种方法,他们担心对他们的就业能力产生负面影响,以及替代的经济方法应该只在高级水平上引入。