“Status quo bias and resistance to positive behaviour support: implications for leaders”

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
K. M. Ntinas
{"title":"“Status quo bias and resistance to positive behaviour support: implications for leaders”","authors":"K. M. Ntinas","doi":"10.1108/tldr-11-2021-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to focus on why some practitioners in learning disability services resist implementing evidence-based approaches, such as positive behaviour support, despite its benefits.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nStatus quo bias theory was used to explain why practitioners choose existing practices over evidence-based approaches despite the negative consequences to their well-being.\n\n\nFindings\nStaff members’ decision to maintain the status quo should not be based solely on a cost–benefit analysis, as is commonly believed, as several factors influence it.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis lies on the development of leadership action based on the factors that influence staff's decision making in favour of the status quo.\n","PeriodicalId":54179,"journal":{"name":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-11-2021-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to focus on why some practitioners in learning disability services resist implementing evidence-based approaches, such as positive behaviour support, despite its benefits. Design/methodology/approach Status quo bias theory was used to explain why practitioners choose existing practices over evidence-based approaches despite the negative consequences to their well-being. Findings Staff members’ decision to maintain the status quo should not be based solely on a cost–benefit analysis, as is commonly believed, as several factors influence it. Originality/value This lies on the development of leadership action based on the factors that influence staff's decision making in favour of the status quo.
现状偏见和对积极行为支持的抵制:对领导者的启示
目的本文旨在关注为什么一些学习障碍服务从业者拒绝实施循证方法,如积极的行为支持,尽管它有好处。设计/方法论/方法现状偏见理论被用来解释为什么从业者选择现有实践而不是循证方法,尽管这对他们的健康产生了负面影响,因为有几个因素会影响它。独创性/价值这取决于领导行动的发展,这些行动是基于影响员工做出有利于现状的决策的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tizard Learning Disability Review
Tizard Learning Disability Review EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信