Play-based learning and assessment practices in early years: methodological explorations

IF 2.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Pyle, Christopher DeLuca, Hanna Wickstrom, Erica Danniels, Ellen Fesseha
{"title":"Play-based learning and assessment practices in early years: methodological explorations","authors":"A. Pyle, Christopher DeLuca, Hanna Wickstrom, Erica Danniels, Ellen Fesseha","doi":"10.1080/00131881.2023.2181201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Teachers’ perspectives provide crucial insights into classroom practice in early childhood education settings. Although many kindergarten programmes emphasise play and assessment to support children’s learning and development, recent research suggests that there are some disparities between teachers’ articulated role of play and what they report assessing during periods of play. As a range of research designs can be used in efforts to probe the complex relationships between perspectives and practice, it is important to consider which methodological approach, or combination of approaches, may prove optimal in early years contexts. Purpose The study sought to explore the relative merits of using (1) semi-structured interview and (2) video-elicitation interview approaches to gain deeper understanding of the connections between teachers’ perspectives and practices within kindergarten education. Methods An in-depth, qualitative enquiry was undertaken. This included classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and video-elicitation interviews from 20 kindergarten classrooms in Ontario, Canada. Interview data were thematically analysed. Findings The analysis indicated that video-elicitation interviewing influenced the structure and content of participants’ responses when compared with semi-structured interviews, providing additional and valuable insights into the ever-present negotiation between perspectives and practice. Conclusion The study highlights how semi-structured and video-elicitation interview approaches each offer particular strengths and limitations, and can be used independently or in combination to gain a deeper understanding of the connection between teachers’ perspectives and their classroom practices. The selection of one approach, or combination of approaches, needs to be carefully aligned with the overarching research goals of a study.","PeriodicalId":47607,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research","volume":"65 1","pages":"248 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2023.2181201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Teachers’ perspectives provide crucial insights into classroom practice in early childhood education settings. Although many kindergarten programmes emphasise play and assessment to support children’s learning and development, recent research suggests that there are some disparities between teachers’ articulated role of play and what they report assessing during periods of play. As a range of research designs can be used in efforts to probe the complex relationships between perspectives and practice, it is important to consider which methodological approach, or combination of approaches, may prove optimal in early years contexts. Purpose The study sought to explore the relative merits of using (1) semi-structured interview and (2) video-elicitation interview approaches to gain deeper understanding of the connections between teachers’ perspectives and practices within kindergarten education. Methods An in-depth, qualitative enquiry was undertaken. This included classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and video-elicitation interviews from 20 kindergarten classrooms in Ontario, Canada. Interview data were thematically analysed. Findings The analysis indicated that video-elicitation interviewing influenced the structure and content of participants’ responses when compared with semi-structured interviews, providing additional and valuable insights into the ever-present negotiation between perspectives and practice. Conclusion The study highlights how semi-structured and video-elicitation interview approaches each offer particular strengths and limitations, and can be used independently or in combination to gain a deeper understanding of the connection between teachers’ perspectives and their classroom practices. The selection of one approach, or combination of approaches, needs to be carefully aligned with the overarching research goals of a study.
幼儿基于游戏的学习和评估实践:方法论探索
摘要背景教师的观点为幼儿教育环境中的课堂实践提供了重要的见解。尽管许多幼儿园项目强调游戏和评估,以支持儿童的学习和发展,但最近的研究表明,教师对游戏的明确角色与他们在游戏期间的评估报告之间存在一些差异。由于一系列研究设计可以用于探索视角和实践之间的复杂关系,因此考虑哪种方法论方法或方法组合在早期环境中可能是最佳的是很重要的。目的本研究试图探索使用(1)半结构化访谈和(2)视频启发访谈方法的相对优点,以更深入地理解教师在幼儿园教育中的观点和实践之间的联系。方法进行深入的定性调查。这包括对加拿大安大略省20间幼儿园教室的课堂观察、半结构化访谈和视频启发访谈。访谈数据按主题进行分析。研究结果分析表明,与半结构化访谈相比,视频启发式访谈影响了参与者回答的结构和内容,为视角和实践之间的谈判提供了额外的、有价值的见解。结论本研究强调了半结构化和视频启发面试方法各自具有特定的优势和局限性,可以单独使用或组合使用,以更深入地理解教师的观点与课堂实践之间的联系。一种方法或多种方法的选择需要与研究的总体研究目标仔细一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research
Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Educational Research, the journal of the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER), was established in 1958. Drawing upon research projects in universities and research centres worldwide, it is the leading international forum for informed thinking on issues of contemporary concern in education. The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and those people concerned with mediating research findings to policy makers and practitioners. Educational Research has a broad scope and contains research studies, reviews of research, discussion pieces, short reports and book reviews in all areas of the education field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信