Revolutions at Home: The Origin of Modern Childhood and the German Middle Class By Emily C. Bruce. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press, 2021. Pp. xii + 246. Paperback $27.95. ISBN: 978-1623545622.

IF 0.4 3区 人文科学 Q1 HISTORY
Joanne F. Schneider
{"title":"Revolutions at Home: The Origin of Modern Childhood and the German Middle Class By Emily C. Bruce. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press, 2021. Pp. xii + 246. Paperback $27.95. ISBN: 978-1623545622.","authors":"Joanne F. Schneider","doi":"10.1017/S0008938922001625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spanish Ulcer. This is essentially a political history, in contrast to the mass of socially-, culturally-, and institutionally-focused scholarship lavished on Napoleonic Germany in recent decades. The Prussian reforms appear here not as the inevitable product of long-term forces or as a premeditated scheme to transfer power from the king to bureaucrats. Rather, they are shown as responses to dire circumstances that created great popular suffering. Trade liberalisation, for example, was driven less by the ideology of Adam Smith than the desire to preempt attempts to bundle Prussia into Napoleon’s “France first” Continental System to the detriment of the kingdom’s producers. The sense of permanent crisis of these years is well charted also in those sections dealing with internal divisions within the Prussian elite. Opposition to King Frederick William III’s official policy of avoiding an open break with Napoleon after Tilsit went beyond the realm of legitimate channels with the emergence of conspiratorial networks of officials and officers who plotted away in the shadows. That things did not go further was largely due to a general acceptance that the king, whatever his faults, remained a popular and unifying symbol. Also important in challenging royal supremacy were the provincial estates, whose prospects for survival (and hence ability to raise credit) looked at times more promising than the future of the central government. All this provides a useful corrective to general accounts that see this period as a preordained triumph for bureaucratic state absolutism. Prietzel concludes with some brief reflections on the extent to which the reforms, designed for the short term, nonetheless succeeded in placing Prussia on a more stable footing over the longer term. In the final analysis, the impression left is that they did not succeed in this. Rather, they contributed to a further politicisation of the population without providing an adequate structure to meet the resulting demands for greater participation in decision-making. These pressures would build up in the following decades and explode in 1848. In the round, Prietzel’s book is a convincing account of the early Prussian reforms, when the situation was especially desperate. Though essentially a history of Prussia, this work is also very informative about Napoleon, his wider empire, and the European state system. What comes across from this broader perspective is that whilst Prussia’s existence looked at times precarious, the French Grande Empire was doomed for the very reason that it proved so utterly incapable of establishing a stable order based upon legality and moderation. These two qualities, both hallmarks of Frederick William III’s kingship, would, in contrast, prove much more durable, even if they also stymied far-reaching reform in the years immediately after Tilsit.","PeriodicalId":45053,"journal":{"name":"Central European History","volume":"56 1","pages":"108 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008938922001625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"人文科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spanish Ulcer. This is essentially a political history, in contrast to the mass of socially-, culturally-, and institutionally-focused scholarship lavished on Napoleonic Germany in recent decades. The Prussian reforms appear here not as the inevitable product of long-term forces or as a premeditated scheme to transfer power from the king to bureaucrats. Rather, they are shown as responses to dire circumstances that created great popular suffering. Trade liberalisation, for example, was driven less by the ideology of Adam Smith than the desire to preempt attempts to bundle Prussia into Napoleon’s “France first” Continental System to the detriment of the kingdom’s producers. The sense of permanent crisis of these years is well charted also in those sections dealing with internal divisions within the Prussian elite. Opposition to King Frederick William III’s official policy of avoiding an open break with Napoleon after Tilsit went beyond the realm of legitimate channels with the emergence of conspiratorial networks of officials and officers who plotted away in the shadows. That things did not go further was largely due to a general acceptance that the king, whatever his faults, remained a popular and unifying symbol. Also important in challenging royal supremacy were the provincial estates, whose prospects for survival (and hence ability to raise credit) looked at times more promising than the future of the central government. All this provides a useful corrective to general accounts that see this period as a preordained triumph for bureaucratic state absolutism. Prietzel concludes with some brief reflections on the extent to which the reforms, designed for the short term, nonetheless succeeded in placing Prussia on a more stable footing over the longer term. In the final analysis, the impression left is that they did not succeed in this. Rather, they contributed to a further politicisation of the population without providing an adequate structure to meet the resulting demands for greater participation in decision-making. These pressures would build up in the following decades and explode in 1848. In the round, Prietzel’s book is a convincing account of the early Prussian reforms, when the situation was especially desperate. Though essentially a history of Prussia, this work is also very informative about Napoleon, his wider empire, and the European state system. What comes across from this broader perspective is that whilst Prussia’s existence looked at times precarious, the French Grande Empire was doomed for the very reason that it proved so utterly incapable of establishing a stable order based upon legality and moderation. These two qualities, both hallmarks of Frederick William III’s kingship, would, in contrast, prove much more durable, even if they also stymied far-reaching reform in the years immediately after Tilsit.
《家里的革命:现代童年与德国中产阶级的起源》,艾米丽·布鲁斯著。波士顿:马萨诸塞大学出版社,2021年。第xii+246页。Paperback 27.95美元。ISBN:978-1623545622。
西班牙溃疡。这本质上是一部政治史,与近几十年来大量以社会、文化和制度为重点的奖学金投入拿破仑时代的德国形成鲜明对比。普鲁士的改革在这里并不是长期力量的必然产物,也不是将权力从国王手中转移给官僚的预谋计划。相反,它们表现为对造成巨大民众痛苦的可怕环境的回应。例如,贸易自由化与其说是由亚当·斯密的意识形态驱动的,不如说是希望先发制人,将普鲁士捆绑到拿破仑的“法国优先”大陆体系中,损害王国的生产商。这些年的永久危机感也在处理普鲁士精英内部分裂的章节中得到了很好的体现。蒂尔西特事件后,反对国王弗雷德里克·威廉三世避免与拿破仑公开决裂的官方政策超出了合法渠道的范围,出现了在幕后策划的官员和军官的阴谋网络。事情没有进一步发展,很大程度上是因为人们普遍认为,无论国王有什么过错,他仍然是一个受欢迎的统一象征。在挑战王室霸权方面同样重要的是省级庄园,其生存前景(以及筹集信贷的能力)有时看起来比中央政府的未来更有希望。所有这些都为人们提供了一个有用的纠正,因为人们认为这一时期是官僚国家专制主义的必然胜利。普里策尔最后简要反思了为短期设计的改革在多大程度上成功地使普鲁士在长期内处于更稳定的基础上。归根结底,给人留下的印象是他们在这方面没有成功。相反,它们助长了人口的进一步政治化,而没有提供足够的结构来满足由此产生的更多参与决策的需求。这些压力将在接下来的几十年里积累起来,并在1848年爆发。总的来说,普里策尔的书对普鲁士早期的改革进行了令人信服的描述,当时的形势尤其危急。虽然这部作品本质上是普鲁士的历史,但它也为拿破仑、他更广泛的帝国和欧洲国家体系提供了大量信息。从这个更广泛的角度来看,尽管普鲁士的存在有时看起来岌岌可危,但法兰西大帝国注定要灭亡,因为事实证明,它完全无法建立一个基于合法性和温和性的稳定秩序。相比之下,这两种品质,都是弗雷德里克·威廉三世国王身份的标志,将被证明更加持久,即使它们也阻碍了蒂尔西特之后几年意义深远的改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Central European History offers articles, review essays, and book reviews that range widely through the history of Germany, Austria, and other German-speaking regions of Central Europe from the medieval era to the present. All topics and approaches to history are welcome, whether cultural, social, political, diplomatic, intellectual, economic, and military history, as well as historiography and methodology. Contributions that treat new fields, such as post-1945 and post-1989 history, maturing fields such as gender history, and less-represented fields such as medieval history and the history of the Habsburg lands are especially desired. The journal thus aims to be the primary venue for scholarly exchange and debate among scholars of the history of Central Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信