Addressing Risk Perceptions of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Margot A. Hurlbert, Larissa Shasko, Michaela Neetz
{"title":"Addressing Risk Perceptions of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure","authors":"Margot A. Hurlbert, Larissa Shasko, Michaela Neetz","doi":"10.1177/15593258221088428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concern over low-dose radiation (LDR) (exposure of less than 100 milligray (mGy)) is resulting in people refusing diagnostic procedures and medical treatment 1 and also inhibiting revision of the linear no-threshold (LNT) assumption that informs much of science policy. This article reviews representative surveys in Ontario and Saskatchewan and focus groups conducted with science and policy stakeholders in addressing how the public and policy stakeholders understand issues of exposure to LDR and how policy issues can be addressed. Research results from focus groups demonstrated that policy stakeholders are knowledgeable about issues surrounding the public and perceptions about LDR and implications for policy consistent with LDR literature. Participants understood that the challenge went beyond providing more education about LDR and issues of emotions and biases must be addressed. This research resulted in rich suggestions for public communication and engagement surrounding LDR and a process for addressing the issue of the LNT.","PeriodicalId":11285,"journal":{"name":"Dose-Response","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dose-Response","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15593258221088428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Concern over low-dose radiation (LDR) (exposure of less than 100 milligray (mGy)) is resulting in people refusing diagnostic procedures and medical treatment 1 and also inhibiting revision of the linear no-threshold (LNT) assumption that informs much of science policy. This article reviews representative surveys in Ontario and Saskatchewan and focus groups conducted with science and policy stakeholders in addressing how the public and policy stakeholders understand issues of exposure to LDR and how policy issues can be addressed. Research results from focus groups demonstrated that policy stakeholders are knowledgeable about issues surrounding the public and perceptions about LDR and implications for policy consistent with LDR literature. Participants understood that the challenge went beyond providing more education about LDR and issues of emotions and biases must be addressed. This research resulted in rich suggestions for public communication and engagement surrounding LDR and a process for addressing the issue of the LNT.
解决低剂量辐射暴露的风险认知
对低剂量辐射(低于100毫克辐射)的担忧导致人们拒绝接受诊断程序和医疗1,也阻碍了对线性无阈值假设的修订,而线性无阈值假设在很大程度上影响了科学政策。本文回顾了安大略省和萨斯喀彻温省的代表性调查,以及与科学和政策利益相关者进行的焦点小组,以解决公众和政策利益相关者如何理解LDR暴露问题以及如何解决政策问题。焦点小组的研究结果表明,政策利益相关者了解围绕公众的问题、对低风险风险的看法以及与低风险风险文献一致的政策影响。与会者明白,挑战不仅仅是提供更多关于低死亡率的教育,而且必须解决情绪和偏见问题。这项研究为围绕LDR的公众沟通和参与提出了丰富的建议,并为解决LNT问题制定了流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dose-Response
Dose-Response PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dose-Response is an open access peer-reviewed online journal publishing original findings and commentaries on the occurrence of dose-response relationships across a broad range of disciplines. Particular interest focuses on experimental evidence providing mechanistic understanding of nonlinear dose-response relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信