Early expressive and receptive language trajectories in high-risk infant siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Julie Longard, J. Brian, L. Zwaigenbaum, E. Duku, C. Moore, I. Smith, N. Garon, P. Szatmari, T. Vaillancourt, S. Bryson
{"title":"Early expressive and receptive language trajectories in high-risk infant siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder","authors":"Julie Longard, J. Brian, L. Zwaigenbaum, E. Duku, C. Moore, I. Smith, N. Garon, P. Szatmari, T. Vaillancourt, S. Bryson","doi":"10.1177/2396941517737418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & aims In response to limited research on early language development in infants at high risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), the current prospective study examined early expressive and receptive language trajectories in familial high-risk (HR) infants who were and were not later diagnosed with ASD (HR-ASD and HR-N, respectively), and low-risk (LR) controls with no family history of ASD. Methods Participants were 523 children (371 HR siblings, 56% boys; 152 LR controls, 52% boys) followed from age 6 or 12 months to 36 months. Based on independent, best-estimate clinical diagnoses at 36 months, HR participants were classified as HR-ASD (n = 94; 69% boys), or HR-N (n = 277; 52% boys); the sample also included 152 LR controls (52% boys). Expressive and receptive language trajectories were examined based on corresponding domain standard scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. In the combined sample of HR and LR infants, semi-parametric group-based modeling was used to identify distinct trajectories in MSEL standard scores. Results A 3-group solution provided optimal fit to variation in both expressive and receptive language, with the following patterns of scores: (1) inclining from average to above average, (2) stable-average, and (3) declining from average to well below average. For both expressive and receptive language, membership in these trajectories was related to 3-year diagnostic outcomes. Conclusions Although HR-ASD, HR-N, and LR control infants were in each trajectory group, membership in the declining trajectory (expressive and/or receptive) was associated with an ASD diagnosis. Implications Evidence of declining trajectories in either expressive or receptive language may be a risk marker for ASD in a high-risk sample.","PeriodicalId":36716,"journal":{"name":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2396941517737418","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941517737418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background & aims In response to limited research on early language development in infants at high risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), the current prospective study examined early expressive and receptive language trajectories in familial high-risk (HR) infants who were and were not later diagnosed with ASD (HR-ASD and HR-N, respectively), and low-risk (LR) controls with no family history of ASD. Methods Participants were 523 children (371 HR siblings, 56% boys; 152 LR controls, 52% boys) followed from age 6 or 12 months to 36 months. Based on independent, best-estimate clinical diagnoses at 36 months, HR participants were classified as HR-ASD (n = 94; 69% boys), or HR-N (n = 277; 52% boys); the sample also included 152 LR controls (52% boys). Expressive and receptive language trajectories were examined based on corresponding domain standard scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. In the combined sample of HR and LR infants, semi-parametric group-based modeling was used to identify distinct trajectories in MSEL standard scores. Results A 3-group solution provided optimal fit to variation in both expressive and receptive language, with the following patterns of scores: (1) inclining from average to above average, (2) stable-average, and (3) declining from average to well below average. For both expressive and receptive language, membership in these trajectories was related to 3-year diagnostic outcomes. Conclusions Although HR-ASD, HR-N, and LR control infants were in each trajectory group, membership in the declining trajectory (expressive and/or receptive) was associated with an ASD diagnosis. Implications Evidence of declining trajectories in either expressive or receptive language may be a risk marker for ASD in a high-risk sample.
自闭症谱系障碍高危婴儿兄弟姐妹的早期表达性和接受性语言轨迹
背景与目的针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)高危婴儿早期语言发展的研究有限,本前瞻性研究考察了后来被诊断为或未被诊断为ASD(分别为HR-ASD和HR- n)的家族高危婴儿(HR)和无ASD家族史的低风险(LR)对照组的早期表达和接受语言轨迹。方法523名儿童(371名兄弟姐妹,56%为男孩;152例LR对照(52%为男孩),随访时间为6或12个月至36个月。根据36个月时独立的、最佳估计的临床诊断,HR参与者被归类为HR- asd (n = 94;69%男孩)或HR-N (n = 277;52%的男孩);样本还包括152例LR对照(52%为男孩)。在6个月、12个月、24个月和36个月时,根据马伦早期学习量表(MSEL)上相应的领域标准分数来检查表达性和接受性语言轨迹。在HR和LR婴儿的联合样本中,采用半参数组为基础的模型来识别MSEL标准得分的不同轨迹。结果3组方案最适合表达性和接受性语言的差异,得分模式如下:(1)从平均水平向高于平均水平倾斜,(2)稳定平均,(3)从平均水平下降到远低于平均水平。对于表达性语言和接受性语言,这些轨迹的成员资格与3年的诊断结果有关。结论:虽然HR-ASD、HR-N和LR对照婴儿在每个轨迹组中,但隶属于下降轨迹(表达性和/或接受性)与ASD诊断相关。在高风险样本中,表达性语言或接受性语言的下降轨迹可能是自闭症的风险标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信