Evolution versus entrenchment: Debating the impact of digitization, democratization and diffusion in the global fashion industry

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
T. Brydges, Brian J. Hracs, M. Lavanga
{"title":"Evolution versus entrenchment: Debating the impact of digitization, democratization and diffusion in the global fashion industry","authors":"T. Brydges, Brian J. Hracs, M. Lavanga","doi":"10.1386/INFS.5.2.365_7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the report The State of Fashion 2017, written by Business of Fashion and the McKinsey Institute (2016), industry executives used three words to describe the current state of the fashion industry: uncertain, changing and challenging. Indeed, the fashion industry is undergoing dramatic transformations, from digitization and the rise of ‘see now, buy now’ fashions, to brands redefining the function and timing of fashion weeks, and increasing levels of global integration and competition (Crewe 2017). As such, the fashion industry has been recognized as a valuable lens through which to explore significant and ongoing changes to the production, curation and consumption of goods, services, and experiences (Brydges et al. 2014; Brydges 2017; D’Ovidio 2015; Hracs et al. 2013; Lavanga 2018; McRobbie 2016; Pratt et al. 2012). \n \nDrawing inspiration from this stream of scholarship, we organized four sessions titled Trending Now: The Changing Geographies of Fashion in the Digital Age at the Royal Geographical Society and Institute of British Geographers (RGS-IBG) conference in London, 30 August – 1 September 2017. In these sessions, researchers and practitioners from a wide range of locations and disciplines – including fashion studies, media studies, cultural economics, business and geography – came together to share research related to the structures, labour dynamics, spaces, value propositions and practices of the contemporary fashion industry. \n \nWhile a range of issues were discussed, the sessions were connected by an overarching theme. Namely, the extent to which power in the fashion industry is expanding or consolidating. While there is a prominent discourse that states that structures, systems and spaces within the global fashion industry have been (and will continue to be) disrupted by new actors, technologies, practices and cities, we collectively questioned whether the fashion industry has really entered an era of democratization, or if established power structures remain entrenched. Through empirical case studies from a variety of geographic contexts – from India to Italy – about different actors and activities within the industry, each presentation contributed new evidence and perspectives to this debate. The discussion below distils some of the key themes that emerged.","PeriodicalId":42103,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fashion Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fashion Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/INFS.5.2.365_7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In the report The State of Fashion 2017, written by Business of Fashion and the McKinsey Institute (2016), industry executives used three words to describe the current state of the fashion industry: uncertain, changing and challenging. Indeed, the fashion industry is undergoing dramatic transformations, from digitization and the rise of ‘see now, buy now’ fashions, to brands redefining the function and timing of fashion weeks, and increasing levels of global integration and competition (Crewe 2017). As such, the fashion industry has been recognized as a valuable lens through which to explore significant and ongoing changes to the production, curation and consumption of goods, services, and experiences (Brydges et al. 2014; Brydges 2017; D’Ovidio 2015; Hracs et al. 2013; Lavanga 2018; McRobbie 2016; Pratt et al. 2012). Drawing inspiration from this stream of scholarship, we organized four sessions titled Trending Now: The Changing Geographies of Fashion in the Digital Age at the Royal Geographical Society and Institute of British Geographers (RGS-IBG) conference in London, 30 August – 1 September 2017. In these sessions, researchers and practitioners from a wide range of locations and disciplines – including fashion studies, media studies, cultural economics, business and geography – came together to share research related to the structures, labour dynamics, spaces, value propositions and practices of the contemporary fashion industry. While a range of issues were discussed, the sessions were connected by an overarching theme. Namely, the extent to which power in the fashion industry is expanding or consolidating. While there is a prominent discourse that states that structures, systems and spaces within the global fashion industry have been (and will continue to be) disrupted by new actors, technologies, practices and cities, we collectively questioned whether the fashion industry has really entered an era of democratization, or if established power structures remain entrenched. Through empirical case studies from a variety of geographic contexts – from India to Italy – about different actors and activities within the industry, each presentation contributed new evidence and perspectives to this debate. The discussion below distils some of the key themes that emerged.
进化与巩固:讨论数字化、民主化和扩散对全球时尚产业的影响
在《时尚商业》(Business of Fashion)和麦肯锡研究院(McKinsey Institute)合著的《2017年时尚现状》(the State of Fashion)报告中,行业高管们用三个词来描述时尚行业的现状:不确定、变化和挑战。事实上,时尚产业正在经历巨大的变革,从数字化和“即看即买”时尚的兴起,到品牌重新定义时装周的功能和时间,以及全球整合和竞争水平的提高(Crewe 2017)。因此,时尚行业被认为是一个有价值的镜头,通过它可以探索商品、服务和体验的生产、管理和消费的重大和持续变化(Brydges等人,2014;布里奇斯2017;D 'Ovidio 2015;Hracs et al. 2013;Lavanga 2018;麦克罗比2016;Pratt et al. 2012)。2017年8月30日至9月1日,我们在伦敦皇家地理学会和英国地理学家协会(RGS-IBG)会议上组织了四场题为“现在趋势:数字时代不断变化的时尚地理”的会议。在这些会议上,来自不同地区和学科的研究人员和实践者——包括时尚研究、媒体研究、文化经济学、商业和地理——聚集在一起,分享有关当代时尚产业的结构、劳动力动态、空间、价值主张和实践的研究。虽然讨论了一系列问题,但各届会议都有一个总体主题。也就是说,时尚产业中权力扩张或巩固的程度。虽然有一个突出的论述指出,全球时尚产业的结构、系统和空间已经(并将继续)被新的参与者、技术、实践和城市所破坏,但我们共同质疑时尚产业是否真的进入了民主化时代,或者既定的权力结构是否仍然根深蒂固。通过对从印度到意大利等不同地理背景下的行业内不同参与者和活动的实证案例研究,每次演讲都为这场辩论提供了新的证据和视角。下面的讨论提炼了一些出现的关键主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Fashion Studies
International Journal of Fashion Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信