Victoria Cain. Schools and Screens: A Watchful History Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021. 272 pp.

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andrew L. Grunzke
{"title":"Victoria Cain. Schools and Screens: A Watchful History Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021. 272 pp.","authors":"Andrew L. Grunzke","doi":"10.1017/heq.2023.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"riage; we see how Black and White students navigated the sharing (or racial segregation) of dining hall tables; we see how White college presidents hired or, more often, did not hire Black faculty amid conflicting demands from constituents. And throughout, Bell highlights the roles of Black students and alumni as “agents of change” who were the strongest advocates for their own equal treatment (p. 8). Bell’s highly focused narrative does come with some drawbacks. While readers get a good sense of how religious and gender ideology permeated the abolitionist colleges, Bell could have given even more context on race and racism. In the absence of regular references to other nineteenth-century colleges, Bell’s critiques can cause readers to forget just how advanced the abolitionist colleges were in comparison. Bell also gives only limited insight into the sources of the colleges’ reinvigorated bigotry. He points toward the rise of two intellectual movements, liberalism and cultural evolutionism, which recast racial equality as the result of an individual’s own merit or a race’s past effort rather than as an intrinsic, preexisting element of human nature. Other causes, however, may have been equally influential. The egalitarian evangelicalism of the abolitionist colleges’ early years is notably absent from Bell’s later chapters, probably because of the institutions’ realignments with a more hierarchy-minded mainstream Christianity. Theology could inspire equality; it could also reinforce difference. Relatedly, it seems likely that this renewed racism did not have academic origins but rather was born, or else never died, in more humble social spaces such as homes and churches. Intellectualism may have only dressed up old prejudices learned outside the ivory tower, prejudices that no civil war could kill. All the same, Degrees of Equality is an excellent book and would make a good addition to the graduate or undergraduate history classroom. Graduate students can learn much from Bell’s precise recounting of human action and motivation. Undergraduates can learn this as well, but also a more basic and “relevant” lesson: that the priorities of their institutions, and even the banalities of the campus dining hall or dating scene, are not without meaning.","PeriodicalId":45631,"journal":{"name":"HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/heq.2023.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

riage; we see how Black and White students navigated the sharing (or racial segregation) of dining hall tables; we see how White college presidents hired or, more often, did not hire Black faculty amid conflicting demands from constituents. And throughout, Bell highlights the roles of Black students and alumni as “agents of change” who were the strongest advocates for their own equal treatment (p. 8). Bell’s highly focused narrative does come with some drawbacks. While readers get a good sense of how religious and gender ideology permeated the abolitionist colleges, Bell could have given even more context on race and racism. In the absence of regular references to other nineteenth-century colleges, Bell’s critiques can cause readers to forget just how advanced the abolitionist colleges were in comparison. Bell also gives only limited insight into the sources of the colleges’ reinvigorated bigotry. He points toward the rise of two intellectual movements, liberalism and cultural evolutionism, which recast racial equality as the result of an individual’s own merit or a race’s past effort rather than as an intrinsic, preexisting element of human nature. Other causes, however, may have been equally influential. The egalitarian evangelicalism of the abolitionist colleges’ early years is notably absent from Bell’s later chapters, probably because of the institutions’ realignments with a more hierarchy-minded mainstream Christianity. Theology could inspire equality; it could also reinforce difference. Relatedly, it seems likely that this renewed racism did not have academic origins but rather was born, or else never died, in more humble social spaces such as homes and churches. Intellectualism may have only dressed up old prejudices learned outside the ivory tower, prejudices that no civil war could kill. All the same, Degrees of Equality is an excellent book and would make a good addition to the graduate or undergraduate history classroom. Graduate students can learn much from Bell’s precise recounting of human action and motivation. Undergraduates can learn this as well, but also a more basic and “relevant” lesson: that the priorities of their institutions, and even the banalities of the campus dining hall or dating scene, are not without meaning.
维多利亚凯恩。学校和屏幕:警惕的历史剑桥,马萨诸塞州:麻省理工学院出版社,2021。272页。
riage;我们看到了黑人和白人学生如何在餐厅餐桌的共享(或种族隔离)中游刃有余;我们看到,在选民的要求相互矛盾的情况下,白人大学校长是如何雇佣或不雇佣黑人教师的。自始至终,贝尔强调了黑人学生和校友作为“变革推动者”的角色,他们是自己平等待遇的最有力倡导者(第8页)。贝尔高度集中的叙述确实有一些缺点。虽然读者很清楚宗教和性别意识形态是如何渗透到废奴主义学院的,但贝尔本可以提供更多关于种族和种族主义的背景。由于没有经常提及其他19世纪的大学,贝尔的批评可能会让读者忘记与之相比,废奴主义大学有多先进。贝尔对大学重新激起偏执的根源也只给出了有限的见解。他指出,自由主义和文化进化论这两种知识运动的兴起,它们将种族平等重塑为个人功绩或种族过去努力的结果,而不是人性中固有的、预先存在的元素。然而,其他原因可能也同样具有影响力。废奴主义学院早期的平等福音主义在贝尔后来的章节中明显缺失,可能是因为这些机构与更具等级意识的主流基督教重新结盟。神学可以激发平等;这也可能强化差异。与此相关的是,这种新出现的种族主义似乎没有学术渊源,而是在家庭和教堂等更为简陋的社会空间中出生,或者从未死亡。知识分子主义可能只是掩盖了在象牙塔之外学到的旧偏见,这些偏见是任何内战都无法消除的。尽管如此,《平等学位》是一本优秀的书,将成为研究生或本科生历史课堂上的一本很好的补充。研究生可以从贝尔对人类行为和动机的精确叙述中学到很多东西。本科生也可以学到这一点,但也可以学到一堂更基本、更“相关”的课:他们所在机构的优先事项,甚至校园食堂或约会场景的平庸,都不无意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: History of Education Quarterly publishes topics that span the history of education, both formal and nonformal, including the history of childhood, youth, and the family. The subjects are not limited to any time period and are universal in scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信