A Comparison of Academic Outcomes and Students’ Satisfaction in Offline, Online, and Blended Teaching Models

Maemunah Sa’diyah, Ira Patriani, Anita Lontaan, Afdaleni Afdaleni, Made Suandika
{"title":"A Comparison of Academic Outcomes and Students’ Satisfaction in Offline, Online, and Blended Teaching Models","authors":"Maemunah Sa’diyah, Ira Patriani, Anita Lontaan, Afdaleni Afdaleni, Made Suandika","doi":"10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blended learning is an alternative solution that the government had come up with to make up for the flaws of online learning, which was put into place during COVID-19 when the offline way of teaching was completely switched. In practice, though, the online method had some problems, so the government came up with a plan to use the mixed learning method. Then, this study was done to see how offline, online, and blended learning models affected learning results and how happy students were with them. The qualitative method was used to do this study. The information used in this study came from 28 students at X University who filled out surveys and were also interviewed. Overall, the results of this study showed that the face-to-face learning approach was the most effective way to learn. This is because students can understand the lessons better and feel more satisfied with this way of learning. Other learning models, on the other hand, have more distractions, making it harder for students to understand the lesson and making them feel like it's hard to follow the teaching process, making students less happy in the end.","PeriodicalId":32470,"journal":{"name":"AlIshlah Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlIshlah Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blended learning is an alternative solution that the government had come up with to make up for the flaws of online learning, which was put into place during COVID-19 when the offline way of teaching was completely switched. In practice, though, the online method had some problems, so the government came up with a plan to use the mixed learning method. Then, this study was done to see how offline, online, and blended learning models affected learning results and how happy students were with them. The qualitative method was used to do this study. The information used in this study came from 28 students at X University who filled out surveys and were also interviewed. Overall, the results of this study showed that the face-to-face learning approach was the most effective way to learn. This is because students can understand the lessons better and feel more satisfied with this way of learning. Other learning models, on the other hand, have more distractions, making it harder for students to understand the lesson and making them feel like it's hard to follow the teaching process, making students less happy in the end.
线下、线上和混合教学模式下学业成绩和学生满意度的比较
混合式学习是政府在新冠疫情期间彻底改变线下教学方式,为弥补在线学习的缺陷而提出的替代方案。然而,在实践中,在线学习方法存在一些问题,因此政府提出了使用混合学习方法的计划。然后,这项研究是为了看看离线、在线和混合学习模式是如何影响学习结果的,以及学生对这些学习模式的满意度。本研究采用定性方法。本研究中使用的信息来自X大学的28名学生,他们填写了调查问卷并接受了采访。总的来说,本研究的结果表明,面对面的学习方式是最有效的学习方式。这是因为学生可以更好地理解课程,并对这种学习方式感到更满意。另一方面,其他学习模式有更多的干扰,让学生更难理解课程,让他们觉得很难跟上教学过程,最终让学生不太开心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
407
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信