Ergothioneine, where are we now?

IF 3 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
B. Halliwell, I. Cheah
{"title":"Ergothioneine, where are we now?","authors":"B. Halliwell, I. Cheah","doi":"10.1002/1873-3468.14350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The water-soluble thione/thiol ergothioneine (ET) was first isolated in 1909 by Charles Tanret [1], from the ergot fungus Claviceps purpurea. This fungus is notorious for the toxicity of some of its metabolites to humans, causing ergotism [2], which has even been linked to the Salem witch trials [3]. However, ergotism has nothing to do with ET, which is instead very safe for human consumption and is synthesized by a range of other fungi and some bacteria (reviewed in [4–9]). Its biosynthetic pathways are reviewed in detail in [6]. Indeed, as far as we know, humans and other animals obtain all their ET from the diet [4,5,7–10], whereas plants seem to obtain it from fungi and other soil microorganisms [9]. An enormous amount of work was done on ET in the 1950s, as summarized in the excellent review by Melville [7]. Interest then waned but has picked up rapidly in recent years (Fig. 1). We, therefore, thought that it was about time for a collection of articles and reviews highlighting the recent developments in the ET field. We, thus, approached both FEBS Letters, which was very supportive, and a range of experts working on ET, who were almost uniformly enthusiastic and happy to contribute. The FEBS Letters Special Issue ‘Ergothioneine, where are we now?’ is the result of these activities and contains 11 articles by leading experts. One catalyst for this upsurge of interest was the discovery in 2005 of a transporter for ET (OCTN1, often now called the ergothioneine transporter, ETT), which accounts for the fact that animals (including humans) take up and avidly retain ET from the diet [11]. The specificity of ETT for ET has often been challenged but has been reconfirmed in several studies [11–13], as reviewed in depth by Grundemann et al. in this special issue [14]. The presence of a specific transporter together with the avid retention of ET in the body implies that this compound is important to us, and indeed in 2018 Bruce Ames proposed that ET be classified as a ‘longevity vitamin’ [15]. No specific deficiency disease has yet been identified for ET, which makes it hard to formally classify it as a vitamin. Perhaps, however, deficiency diseases are staring us in the face: low blood or plasma levels of ET are correlated with increased risk of frailty [16–18], cardiovascular disease [19], mild cognitive impairment [18, 20–22], dementia [22,23] and Parkinson’s disease [24]. Indeed, ET has many neuroprotective properties [4,5,18,26,27], as reviewed in detail in this special issue [18,25,26]. Consistent with a key protective role of ET against the development of age-related diseases, higher dietary consumption of mushrooms, a rich source of ET [9], is associated with lower disease risk [28–31]. However, we must be cautious; to quote an old phrase ‘correlation does not imply causation’. Low ET levels may predispose to disease, but disease could also lead to low ET levels. Possible reasons could include alterations in diet due to illness so that less ET is consumed, and/or decreases in ETT activity in the gut (leading to less ET uptake) or kidney (impairing ET","PeriodicalId":50454,"journal":{"name":"FEBS Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEBS Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.14350","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The water-soluble thione/thiol ergothioneine (ET) was first isolated in 1909 by Charles Tanret [1], from the ergot fungus Claviceps purpurea. This fungus is notorious for the toxicity of some of its metabolites to humans, causing ergotism [2], which has even been linked to the Salem witch trials [3]. However, ergotism has nothing to do with ET, which is instead very safe for human consumption and is synthesized by a range of other fungi and some bacteria (reviewed in [4–9]). Its biosynthetic pathways are reviewed in detail in [6]. Indeed, as far as we know, humans and other animals obtain all their ET from the diet [4,5,7–10], whereas plants seem to obtain it from fungi and other soil microorganisms [9]. An enormous amount of work was done on ET in the 1950s, as summarized in the excellent review by Melville [7]. Interest then waned but has picked up rapidly in recent years (Fig. 1). We, therefore, thought that it was about time for a collection of articles and reviews highlighting the recent developments in the ET field. We, thus, approached both FEBS Letters, which was very supportive, and a range of experts working on ET, who were almost uniformly enthusiastic and happy to contribute. The FEBS Letters Special Issue ‘Ergothioneine, where are we now?’ is the result of these activities and contains 11 articles by leading experts. One catalyst for this upsurge of interest was the discovery in 2005 of a transporter for ET (OCTN1, often now called the ergothioneine transporter, ETT), which accounts for the fact that animals (including humans) take up and avidly retain ET from the diet [11]. The specificity of ETT for ET has often been challenged but has been reconfirmed in several studies [11–13], as reviewed in depth by Grundemann et al. in this special issue [14]. The presence of a specific transporter together with the avid retention of ET in the body implies that this compound is important to us, and indeed in 2018 Bruce Ames proposed that ET be classified as a ‘longevity vitamin’ [15]. No specific deficiency disease has yet been identified for ET, which makes it hard to formally classify it as a vitamin. Perhaps, however, deficiency diseases are staring us in the face: low blood or plasma levels of ET are correlated with increased risk of frailty [16–18], cardiovascular disease [19], mild cognitive impairment [18, 20–22], dementia [22,23] and Parkinson’s disease [24]. Indeed, ET has many neuroprotective properties [4,5,18,26,27], as reviewed in detail in this special issue [18,25,26]. Consistent with a key protective role of ET against the development of age-related diseases, higher dietary consumption of mushrooms, a rich source of ET [9], is associated with lower disease risk [28–31]. However, we must be cautious; to quote an old phrase ‘correlation does not imply causation’. Low ET levels may predispose to disease, but disease could also lead to low ET levels. Possible reasons could include alterations in diet due to illness so that less ET is consumed, and/or decreases in ETT activity in the gut (leading to less ET uptake) or kidney (impairing ET
麦角硫因,我们讲到哪了?
水溶性硫酮/硫醇麦角硫酮(ET)于1909年由Charles Tanret[1]从麦角真菌紫锥菌中首次分离出来。这种真菌因其某些代谢产物对人类的毒性而臭名昭著,导致麦角主义[2],甚至与塞勒姆女巫试验有关[3]。然而,麦角主义与ET无关,ET对人类食用非常安全,由一系列其他真菌和一些细菌合成(综述见[4-9])。其生物合成途径在[6]中有详细的综述。事实上,据我们所知,人类和其他动物的所有ET都是从饮食中获得的[4,5,7-10],而植物似乎是从真菌和其他土壤微生物中获得的[9]。正如Melville的优秀评论[7]所总结的那样,20世纪50年代在ET方面做了大量的工作。兴趣随后减弱,但近年来迅速回升(图1)。因此,我们认为现在是时候收集一系列文章和评论,重点介绍ET领域的最新发展了。因此,我们联系了非常支持我们的FEBS Letters,以及一系列从事ET工作的专家,他们几乎都非常热情并乐于做出贡献。FEBS信件特刊“Ergothioneine,我们现在在哪里?”是这些活动的成果,其中包括11篇由顶尖专家撰写的文章。这种兴趣激增的一个催化剂是2005年发现的ET转运蛋白(OCTN1,现在通常被称为麦角硫酮转运蛋白,ETT),这解释了动物(包括人类)从饮食中吸收并大量保留ET的事实[11]。ETT对ET的特异性经常受到质疑,但在几项研究中得到了重新确认[11-13],Grundemann等人在本期特刊[14]中对此进行了深入审查。特定转运蛋白的存在以及ET在体内的大量滞留意味着这种化合物对我们很重要,事实上,Bruce Ames在2018年提出将ET归类为“长寿维生素”[15]。目前还没有发现ET的特定缺乏症,这使得很难将其正式归类为维生素。然而,也许缺乏症正摆在我们面前:低血或血浆ET水平与虚弱[16-18]、心血管疾病[19]、轻度认知障碍[18,20-22]、痴呆[22,23]和帕金森病[24]的风险增加有关。事实上,ET具有许多神经保护特性[4,5,18,26,27],详见本期特刊[18,25,26]。与ET对年龄相关疾病发展的关键保护作用一致,蘑菇是ET的丰富来源[9],其饮食摄入量越高,疾病风险越低[28-31]。然而,我们必须保持谨慎;引用一句老话“相关性并不意味着因果关系”。ET水平低可能易患疾病,但疾病也可能导致ET水平低。可能的原因可能包括由于疾病导致饮食改变,从而消耗更少的ET,和/或肠道或肾脏中ETT活性降低(导致ET摄入减少)或损害ET
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FEBS Letters
FEBS Letters 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
303
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: FEBS Letters is one of the world''s leading journals in molecular biology and is renowned both for its quality of content and speed of production. Bringing together the most important developments in the molecular biosciences, FEBS Letters provides an international forum for Minireviews, Research Letters and Hypotheses that merit urgent publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信