Academic Dishonesty Identification through Gender and Grade Using Chi-Square Analysis

D. Kurniawati, Tika Dwi Ariyanti
{"title":"Academic Dishonesty Identification through Gender and Grade Using Chi-Square Analysis","authors":"D. Kurniawati, Tika Dwi Ariyanti","doi":"10.31940/soshum.v12i3.290-299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic dishonesty, as a cheating act done by students, has always been a significant challenge in education. It reflects integrity and responsibility as the main element in character development. Many studies had done to identify variables behind students' dishonesty. Hensley (2013) said male students are likelier to cheat and plagiarise. This study measured further through a perspective questionnaire using a vignette test for vocational education during an online class. The variables were designed based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs with six dependent and five independent variables. The analysis of this study applied chi-square quantitative analysis. At the same time, the data was collected using random sampling from semesters 1,3 and 5 of the Informatics Engineering study program in Politeknik Negeri Jakarta. This study was conducted during COVID -19 Pandemic when all the teaching, learning and assessment processes were conducted online. This study showed that gender and grade did not affect students’ motivation to cheat during online exams. At the same time, the chi-square analysis reflected the same result for both gender and grade analysis. They did not highly influence academic dishonesty in the online test. This study exposed us to varied insights into variables behind academic dishonesty, such as religiosity, lecturer and course and system. This finding triggered further study and evaluation of the institution system and human resource development since they had a role in shifting the phenomena.","PeriodicalId":56206,"journal":{"name":"Soshum Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soshum Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v12i3.290-299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic dishonesty, as a cheating act done by students, has always been a significant challenge in education. It reflects integrity and responsibility as the main element in character development. Many studies had done to identify variables behind students' dishonesty. Hensley (2013) said male students are likelier to cheat and plagiarise. This study measured further through a perspective questionnaire using a vignette test for vocational education during an online class. The variables were designed based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs with six dependent and five independent variables. The analysis of this study applied chi-square quantitative analysis. At the same time, the data was collected using random sampling from semesters 1,3 and 5 of the Informatics Engineering study program in Politeknik Negeri Jakarta. This study was conducted during COVID -19 Pandemic when all the teaching, learning and assessment processes were conducted online. This study showed that gender and grade did not affect students’ motivation to cheat during online exams. At the same time, the chi-square analysis reflected the same result for both gender and grade analysis. They did not highly influence academic dishonesty in the online test. This study exposed us to varied insights into variables behind academic dishonesty, such as religiosity, lecturer and course and system. This finding triggered further study and evaluation of the institution system and human resource development since they had a role in shifting the phenomena.
应用卡方分析从性别和年级角度识别学术不端行为
学术不诚信作为学生的作弊行为,一直是教育界面临的重大挑战。它反映了正直和责任是性格发展的主要因素。许多研究已经确定了学生不诚实背后的变量。Hensley(2013)说,男生更容易作弊和剽窃。这项研究通过一份透视问卷进行了进一步的测量,该问卷使用了在线课堂上职业教育的小插曲测试。这些变量是根据马斯洛的需求层次设计的,有六个因变量和五个自变量。本研究的分析采用卡方定量分析。同时,数据是从雅加达国家理工大学信息工程研究项目的第1、3和5学期随机抽样收集的。这项研究是在COVID-19大流行期间进行的,当时所有的教学、学习和评估过程都是在线进行的。这项研究表明,性别和年级不会影响学生在网上考试中作弊的动机。同时,卡方分析反映了性别和年级分析的相同结果。他们并没有对在线测试中的学术不诚实行为产生很大影响。这项研究让我们对学术不诚实背后的变量有了不同的见解,比如宗教信仰、讲师、课程和制度。这一发现引发了对制度体系和人力资源开发的进一步研究和评估,因为它们在改变这一现象方面发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信