My Journey in Ming Studies: An Interview with Professor Lin Li-yueh 林麗月

IF 1.1 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Yi Jo-lan, Lin Li-yueh
{"title":"My Journey in Ming Studies: An Interview with Professor Lin Li-yueh 林麗月","authors":"Yi Jo-lan, Lin Li-yueh","doi":"10.1080/0147037X.2021.1950407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lin Li-yueh: The reason I chose Ming history as my research field is closely related to influences from my educational background. In 1972, I entered the Graduate School of History at National Taiwan Normal University as a master’s degree student. Most of my classmates at the time were researching modern and contemporary Chinese history, especially the history of the late Qing dynasty. While I was in the master’s program, I took many courses in modern history. But I think to understand the changes taking place in modern China, we should not focus all our attention on the 19th century, but also deeply investigate history prior to the mid-19th century. At that time, in courses teaching Chinese history by period at Taiwanese universities, the Qing dynasty up to the mid-19th century was classified as “Qing history,” while the Qing dynasty from the mid-19th century onwards belonged to “modern Chinese history.” The content being taught was largely unrelated to the late Ming or early Qing dynasties or even earlier Ming history. In one regard, I held a certain amount of interest and curiosity in research concerned with the internal changes in Chinese politics, society, and thought prior to the impact of Western influence during the 19th century; and in another, I also thought at the time that there should be more young scholars working on questions regarding premodern China, and so I paid particular attention to Chinese society before the 17th and 18th century. My choice to settle on Ming history from the 14th to the 17th century for my master’s thesis can thus be said to be a result of these academic concerns.","PeriodicalId":41737,"journal":{"name":"Ming Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ming Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0147037X.2021.1950407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lin Li-yueh: The reason I chose Ming history as my research field is closely related to influences from my educational background. In 1972, I entered the Graduate School of History at National Taiwan Normal University as a master’s degree student. Most of my classmates at the time were researching modern and contemporary Chinese history, especially the history of the late Qing dynasty. While I was in the master’s program, I took many courses in modern history. But I think to understand the changes taking place in modern China, we should not focus all our attention on the 19th century, but also deeply investigate history prior to the mid-19th century. At that time, in courses teaching Chinese history by period at Taiwanese universities, the Qing dynasty up to the mid-19th century was classified as “Qing history,” while the Qing dynasty from the mid-19th century onwards belonged to “modern Chinese history.” The content being taught was largely unrelated to the late Ming or early Qing dynasties or even earlier Ming history. In one regard, I held a certain amount of interest and curiosity in research concerned with the internal changes in Chinese politics, society, and thought prior to the impact of Western influence during the 19th century; and in another, I also thought at the time that there should be more young scholars working on questions regarding premodern China, and so I paid particular attention to Chinese society before the 17th and 18th century. My choice to settle on Ming history from the 14th to the 17th century for my master’s thesis can thus be said to be a result of these academic concerns.
我的明学之旅——访林教授林麗月
林立岳:我之所以选择明史作为我的研究领域,与我的教育背景影响密切相关。1972年,我进入国立台湾师范大学历史系研究生院攻读硕士学位。当时我的大多数同学都在研究中国近现代史,尤其是晚清史。在读硕士期间,我修了很多现代史方面的课程。但我认为,要理解现代中国发生的变化,我们不应该把所有的注意力都集中在19世纪,而应该深入研究19世纪中期之前的历史。当时,在台湾大学按时期教授中国历史的课程中,清朝到19世纪中叶被归类为“清史”,而清朝从19世纪中叶开始属于“中国近代史”。所教授的内容在很大程度上与明末清初甚至明朝早期的历史无关。一方面,我对19世纪受西方影响之前中国政治、社会和思想的内部变化的研究有一定的兴趣和好奇心;另一方面,我当时也认为应该有更多的年轻学者研究前现代中国的问题,所以我特别关注17、18世纪以前的中国社会。因此,我选择以14世纪至17世纪的明史作为硕士论文的主题,可以说是出于这些学术上的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ming Studies
Ming Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信