Factors affecting cross-language activation and language mixing in bilingual aphasia: A case study

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Solène Hameau, Urszula Dmowski, L. Nickels
{"title":"Factors affecting cross-language activation and language mixing in bilingual aphasia: A case study","authors":"Solène Hameau, Urszula Dmowski, L. Nickels","doi":"10.1080/02687038.2022.2081960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Some bilinguals with aphasia tend to mix languages within a single utterance. Two opposing views attribute this to difficulty with either language control or word retrieval. Aims This study investigated the influence of factors that increase activation of the non-target language on the occurrence of language mixing errors. This increased activation predicts more language mixing errors if there is a language control issue, but not if they stem from word retrieval difficulties. Methods and procedures A picture naming experiment was conducted with a bilingual individual with aphasia who showed language mixing. We investigated the influence of four factors likely to influence activation of representations of the non-target language on response accuracy, response latency and the occurrence of language selection errors: language, language mode, task, and phonological overlap between the target word and its translation equivalent. Outcomes and results The increased activation of the non-target language induced by language mode, task and phonological overlap with the translation equivalent did not lead to an increase in language selection errors when compared to correct responses. This is despite the fact that these factors affected accuracy and response latency, in the direction that is expected in unimpaired bilingual performance. Conclusions Results were not consistent with a disruption of the cognitive control needed to respond in the intended language. Instead, they highlight that language mixing in this individual, rather than being “pathological”, is instead used as a strategy to potentially improve communication when lexical retrieval difficulties occur. Language mixing behaviours in aphasia may not be due to issues of control and have a communicative value that should be recognised.","PeriodicalId":50744,"journal":{"name":"Aphasiology","volume":"37 1","pages":"1149 - 1172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aphasiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2022.2081960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Some bilinguals with aphasia tend to mix languages within a single utterance. Two opposing views attribute this to difficulty with either language control or word retrieval. Aims This study investigated the influence of factors that increase activation of the non-target language on the occurrence of language mixing errors. This increased activation predicts more language mixing errors if there is a language control issue, but not if they stem from word retrieval difficulties. Methods and procedures A picture naming experiment was conducted with a bilingual individual with aphasia who showed language mixing. We investigated the influence of four factors likely to influence activation of representations of the non-target language on response accuracy, response latency and the occurrence of language selection errors: language, language mode, task, and phonological overlap between the target word and its translation equivalent. Outcomes and results The increased activation of the non-target language induced by language mode, task and phonological overlap with the translation equivalent did not lead to an increase in language selection errors when compared to correct responses. This is despite the fact that these factors affected accuracy and response latency, in the direction that is expected in unimpaired bilingual performance. Conclusions Results were not consistent with a disruption of the cognitive control needed to respond in the intended language. Instead, they highlight that language mixing in this individual, rather than being “pathological”, is instead used as a strategy to potentially improve communication when lexical retrieval difficulties occur. Language mixing behaviours in aphasia may not be due to issues of control and have a communicative value that should be recognised.
影响双语失语症跨语言激活和语言混合的因素:个案研究
摘要背景一些失语症的双语者倾向于在一句话中混合语言。两种相反的观点将其归因于语言控制或单词检索的困难。本研究探讨了增加非目标语言激活的因素对语言混合错误发生的影响。如果存在语言控制问题,这种激活的增加会预测更多的语言混合错误,但如果它们源于单词检索困难,则不会。方法和程序对一名表现为语言混合的双语失语症患者进行图片命名实验。我们研究了四个可能影响非目标语言表征激活的因素对反应准确性、反应潜伏期和语言选择错误发生的影响:语言、语言模式、任务以及目标词与其翻译等价物之间的语音重叠。结果与结果与正确回答相比,语言模式、任务和语音与翻译等价物的重叠引起的非目标语言的激活增加并没有导致语言选择错误的增加。尽管这些因素影响了准确性和响应延迟,但在双语表现不受影响的情况下,这是意料之中的。结论结果不符合以预期语言做出反应所需的认知控制的中断。相反,他们强调,当词汇检索出现困难时,这个人的语言混合并不是“病态的”,而是作为一种潜在的改善沟通的策略。失语症患者的语言混合行为可能不是由于控制问题,而是具有应该认识到的交际价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aphasiology
Aphasiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aphasiology is concerned with all aspects of language impairment and disability and related disorders resulting from brain damage. It provides a forum for the exchange of knowledge and the dissemination of current research and expertise in all aspects of aphasia and related topics, from all disciplinary perspectives. Aphasiology includes papers on clinical, psychological, linguistic, social and neurological perspectives of aphasia, and attracts contributions and readership from researchers and practitioners in speech and language pathology, neurology, neuropsychology and neurolinguistics. Studies using a wide range of empirical methods, including experimental, clinical and single case studies, surveys and physical investigations are published in addition to regular features including major reviews, clinical fora, case studies, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信