Dueling Reflexivities: A Duoethnographic Exploration of the Privilege Inherent in Sharing Reflexive Considerations

L. Cain, J. M. Coker
{"title":"Dueling Reflexivities: A Duoethnographic Exploration of the Privilege Inherent in Sharing Reflexive Considerations","authors":"L. Cain, J. M. Coker","doi":"10.1177/19408447221097629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We wrote and performed this script as part of ICQI’s 2019 conference. This reader’s theatre production allowed us to share our experiences as a faculty member and student in a doctoral Introduction to Qualitative Research Course, in which a reflexivity assignment created a lot of tension and anxiety for the student who has multiple marginalized identities. We hope that by sharing this story, faculty of qualitative methods can be more aware of potential experiences faced by their students and how those experiences can affect their learning in the classroom. We have included stage directions in italics, and have designated when one of us is speaking to each other, and when we have chosen to break the fourth wall and speak directly to the audience/our readers.","PeriodicalId":90874,"journal":{"name":"International review of qualitative research : IRQR","volume":"16 1","pages":"103 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International review of qualitative research : IRQR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447221097629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We wrote and performed this script as part of ICQI’s 2019 conference. This reader’s theatre production allowed us to share our experiences as a faculty member and student in a doctoral Introduction to Qualitative Research Course, in which a reflexivity assignment created a lot of tension and anxiety for the student who has multiple marginalized identities. We hope that by sharing this story, faculty of qualitative methods can be more aware of potential experiences faced by their students and how those experiences can affect their learning in the classroom. We have included stage directions in italics, and have designated when one of us is speaking to each other, and when we have chosen to break the fourth wall and speak directly to the audience/our readers.
决斗的反射性:共享反射性思考中固有特权的双重人种学探索
作为ICQI 2019年会议的一部分,我们编写并执行了此脚本。这部读者戏剧作品让我们能够分享我们作为教师和学生在定性研究博士导论课程中的经历,在该课程中,一项自反性作业给具有多重边缘化身份的学生带来了很多紧张和焦虑。我们希望通过分享这个故事,定性方法的教师能够更多地了解学生面临的潜在经历,以及这些经历如何影响他们在课堂上的学习。我们用斜体字列出了舞台指示,并指定了我们中的一个人何时相互交谈,以及我们何时选择打破第四堵墙,直接与观众/读者交谈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信