Longing for the Tonic in Robert Schumann's ‘Meine Rose’ Op. 90 No. 2 and Fantasiestück Op. 73 No. 1

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Lauri Suurpää
{"title":"Longing for the Tonic in Robert Schumann's ‘Meine Rose’ Op. 90 No. 2 and Fantasiestück Op. 73 No. 1","authors":"Lauri Suurpää","doi":"10.1017/S1479409821000483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article studies two late works by Schumann: the Lied ‘Meine Rose’, Op. 90 No. 2 (1850), and the Fantasiestück, Op. 73 No. 1, for clarinet and piano (1849). It analyses the works in the light of nineteenth-century developments in approaches to the treatment of tonality. Both ‘Meine Rose’ and the Fantasiestück are miniatures and can thus be linked with music-making in private salons. The choice of the two works is based on musical as well as aesthetic factors. Musically, they both avoid confirming their main tonic in a firm manner, a feature that the article links with aesthetics of the time. Most importantly, the music's inability to secure a firm tonal centre can be associated with early nineteenth-century aesthetics of longing: in the same way that unsuccessful attempts to secure the tonic underlie the two Schumann works, so contemporaneous aesthetics saw human existence as being governed by unfulfilled longing. The paper argues that in ‘Meine Rose’ the Romantic ideology can be connected to transcendental qualities associated with nature, while the Fantasiestück can be associated more generally with infinity and longing. In both works, it is precisely Schumann's special treatment of the tonic, drastically departing from Classical conventions, that justifies connecting the works with these aesthetic issues.","PeriodicalId":41351,"journal":{"name":"Nineteenth-Century Music Review","volume":"20 1","pages":"385 - 408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nineteenth-Century Music Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479409821000483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article studies two late works by Schumann: the Lied ‘Meine Rose’, Op. 90 No. 2 (1850), and the Fantasiestück, Op. 73 No. 1, for clarinet and piano (1849). It analyses the works in the light of nineteenth-century developments in approaches to the treatment of tonality. Both ‘Meine Rose’ and the Fantasiestück are miniatures and can thus be linked with music-making in private salons. The choice of the two works is based on musical as well as aesthetic factors. Musically, they both avoid confirming their main tonic in a firm manner, a feature that the article links with aesthetics of the time. Most importantly, the music's inability to secure a firm tonal centre can be associated with early nineteenth-century aesthetics of longing: in the same way that unsuccessful attempts to secure the tonic underlie the two Schumann works, so contemporaneous aesthetics saw human existence as being governed by unfulfilled longing. The paper argues that in ‘Meine Rose’ the Romantic ideology can be connected to transcendental qualities associated with nature, while the Fantasiestück can be associated more generally with infinity and longing. In both works, it is precisely Schumann's special treatment of the tonic, drastically departing from Classical conventions, that justifies connecting the works with these aesthetic issues.
罗伯特·舒曼的《我的玫瑰》作品90第2号和《幻想曲》作品73第1号中对主音的渴望
本文研究了舒曼的两部晚期作品:《我的玫瑰》,作品90 No. 2(1850),以及《幻想交响曲》,作品73 No. 1,单簧管和钢琴(1849)。它分析的作品在十九世纪的发展,在方法处理调性。“我的玫瑰”和“幻想曲”都是微缩模型,因此可以与私人沙龙的音乐制作联系起来。这两部作品的选择是基于音乐和审美因素。在音乐上,他们都避免以坚定的方式确认他们的主主音,这是文章与时代美学联系在一起的一个特点。最重要的是,音乐无法确保一个坚定的音调中心可以与19世纪早期的渴望美学联系在一起:同样的方式,不成功的尝试确保主音是舒曼两部作品的基础,所以同时代的美学认为人类的存在是由未实现的渴望所支配的。本文认为,在《我的玫瑰》中,浪漫主义的意识形态可以与与自然相关的先验品质联系在一起,而幻想主义的意识形态则可以与无限和渴望联系在一起。在这两部作品中,正是舒曼对主音的特殊处理,彻底背离了古典传统,证明了将这些作品与这些美学问题联系起来是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
66.70%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信