Decolonizing Research and Urban Youth Work Through Community-University Partnerships

I. Livstrom, Amy Smith, M. Rogers, Karl Hackansan
{"title":"Decolonizing Research and Urban Youth Work Through Community-University Partnerships","authors":"I. Livstrom, Amy Smith, M. Rogers, Karl Hackansan","doi":"10.24926/ijps.v5i3.1454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Grounding Roots” is a community-based collaborative educational program that aims to build food, environmental, and cognitive justice through sustainable urban agriculture and horticulture via intergenerational communities of practice. Drawing upon Linda Tuhiwai Smith’s framework of decolonizing methodologies, this qualitative case study examined the ways in which a Community-University partnership engaged in decolonizing work through research and practice, as well as the ways in which the partnership served to preserve colonizing practices. Data analyses was guided by deductive coding strategies grounded in theory on decolonizing practices. Identified decolonizing practices included implementing a program of worth to the community and youth; building from community-led agendas; and prioritizing community healing and transformation over academic research agendas. Identified colonizing practices included inequitable power hierarchies in the leadership team and in garden groups, deficit-oriented talk about minoritized youth, and the devalorization of youth voice. Implications from this work call for researchers to do their own research about the white supremacist roots embedded in their practices, and to embrace decolonizing and humanizing practices to guide their work. This ongoing work highlights the need for researchers doing community-based work to engage in community-driven agendas that prioritize processes over products; to facilitate distributed leadership in collaboration with community members; and to produce worthwhile work and products with the community.","PeriodicalId":93186,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary journal of partnership studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary journal of partnership studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/ijps.v5i3.1454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

“Grounding Roots” is a community-based collaborative educational program that aims to build food, environmental, and cognitive justice through sustainable urban agriculture and horticulture via intergenerational communities of practice. Drawing upon Linda Tuhiwai Smith’s framework of decolonizing methodologies, this qualitative case study examined the ways in which a Community-University partnership engaged in decolonizing work through research and practice, as well as the ways in which the partnership served to preserve colonizing practices. Data analyses was guided by deductive coding strategies grounded in theory on decolonizing practices. Identified decolonizing practices included implementing a program of worth to the community and youth; building from community-led agendas; and prioritizing community healing and transformation over academic research agendas. Identified colonizing practices included inequitable power hierarchies in the leadership team and in garden groups, deficit-oriented talk about minoritized youth, and the devalorization of youth voice. Implications from this work call for researchers to do their own research about the white supremacist roots embedded in their practices, and to embrace decolonizing and humanizing practices to guide their work. This ongoing work highlights the need for researchers doing community-based work to engage in community-driven agendas that prioritize processes over products; to facilitate distributed leadership in collaboration with community members; and to produce worthwhile work and products with the community.
通过社区大学伙伴关系实现研究非殖民化和城市青年工作
“扎根”是一个基于社区的合作教育项目,旨在通过代际实践社区,通过可持续的城市农业和园艺,建立食品、环境和认知正义。这项定性案例研究借鉴了Linda Tuhiwai-Smith的非殖民化方法框架,考察了社区大学伙伴关系通过研究和实践参与非殖民化工作的方式,以及该伙伴关系维护殖民实践的方式。数据分析以基于非殖民化实践理论的演绎编码策略为指导。已确定的非殖民化做法包括实施一项对社区和青年有价值的方案;根据社区主导的议程进行建设;将社区康复和转型置于学术研究议程之上。已确定的殖民主义做法包括领导团队和花园小组中不公平的权力等级制度,对少数族裔青年的赤字导向言论,以及对青年声音的贬低。这项工作的启示要求研究人员对他们实践中的白人至上主义根源进行自己的研究,并接受非殖民化和人性化的实践来指导他们的工作。这项正在进行的工作强调了从事社区工作的研究人员需要参与社区驱动的议程,将流程置于产品之上;与社区成员合作,促进分散领导;与社区一起制作有价值的作品和产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信