The role of South-South Cooperation in shifting dominant narratives and models in development and in evaluation

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Z. Ofir
{"title":"The role of South-South Cooperation in shifting dominant narratives and models in development and in evaluation","authors":"Z. Ofir","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.71630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades, evaluation in the Global South has grown by leaps and bounds. Yet a vast majority of the theories and practices in evaluation emanate from the Global North, often shaped by North-South cooperation (NSC) ‘aid’ financing. It is only recently that South-South cooperation (SSC) has become a force to be reckoned with as a result of shifts in economic power from West to East. A collaboration shaped by shared histories, socioeconomic conditions and a set of principles very different from those underlying NSC, the group of around 140 countries in the Global South known as the ‘G77+China’ holds significant potential for changing the dominant, often destructive narratives and practices about development that have shaped much of the world today. Yet this potential is largely underreported and underexplored, and therefore undervalued. The field of development evaluation has been largely absent from, and also at times caught up in the often highly charged political and technical forums where SSC and its evaluation practices are being shaped. Instead, development evaluation continues to be shaped by North-South interactions, diminishing the potential value of innovative engagements with efforts to advance South-South cooperation as well as South-South cooperation in evaluation for the benefit of both the Global South and the global challenges that humanity faces in the era of the Anthropocene. This article introduces some of the key dynamics in South-South cooperation, and highlights some of the opportunities that can inspire more dynamic engagement and collaboration between the global evaluation community – especially those from, and working in the Global South - and the researchers, economists, financiers and decisionmakers involved in South-South cooperation. This can help accelerate efforts to transform the field of evaluation to be more suited to this era.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.71630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Over the last two decades, evaluation in the Global South has grown by leaps and bounds. Yet a vast majority of the theories and practices in evaluation emanate from the Global North, often shaped by North-South cooperation (NSC) ‘aid’ financing. It is only recently that South-South cooperation (SSC) has become a force to be reckoned with as a result of shifts in economic power from West to East. A collaboration shaped by shared histories, socioeconomic conditions and a set of principles very different from those underlying NSC, the group of around 140 countries in the Global South known as the ‘G77+China’ holds significant potential for changing the dominant, often destructive narratives and practices about development that have shaped much of the world today. Yet this potential is largely underreported and underexplored, and therefore undervalued. The field of development evaluation has been largely absent from, and also at times caught up in the often highly charged political and technical forums where SSC and its evaluation practices are being shaped. Instead, development evaluation continues to be shaped by North-South interactions, diminishing the potential value of innovative engagements with efforts to advance South-South cooperation as well as South-South cooperation in evaluation for the benefit of both the Global South and the global challenges that humanity faces in the era of the Anthropocene. This article introduces some of the key dynamics in South-South cooperation, and highlights some of the opportunities that can inspire more dynamic engagement and collaboration between the global evaluation community – especially those from, and working in the Global South - and the researchers, economists, financiers and decisionmakers involved in South-South cooperation. This can help accelerate efforts to transform the field of evaluation to be more suited to this era.
南南合作在改变发展和评价中的主导叙述和模式方面的作用
在过去二十年中,全球南方的评价工作突飞猛进。然而,评估中的绝大多数理论和实践来自全球北方,通常由南北合作(NSC)的“援助”融资形成。直到最近,由于经济实力从西方向东方的转变,南南合作才成为一股不可忽视的力量。全球南方约140个国家组成的“77国集团+中国”是一个由共同的历史、社会经济条件和一套与NSC基本原则截然不同的原则形成的合作组织,具有改变当今世界大部分地区主导的、往往具有破坏性的发展叙事和做法的巨大潜力。然而,这种潜力在很大程度上被低估和挖掘不足,因此被低估了。发展评价领域在很大程度上没有出现,有时也会出现在经常充满活力的政治和技术论坛上,在这些论坛上,南南合作及其评价做法正在形成。相反,发展评估继续受到南北互动的影响,降低了创新参与的潜在价值,努力促进南南合作以及南南合作,以造福全球南方和人类世时代人类面临的全球挑战。本文介绍了南南合作的一些关键动态,并强调了一些机会,这些机会可以激发全球评价界——特别是来自全球南方并在全球南方工作的评价界——与参与南南合作的研究人员、经济学家、金融家和决策者之间更具活力的参与和合作。这有助于加快评估领域的转型,使其更适合这个时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信