Analytical Study of Buckling Restrained Braced Frames in Different Seismic Zone Using ETABS

IF 1.1 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Aparna Shiny Gottem, N. Lingeshwaran, Y. Himath Kumar, Ch. Mallika Chowdary, S. Pratheba, K. Perumal
{"title":"Analytical Study of Buckling Restrained Braced Frames in Different Seismic Zone Using ETABS","authors":"Aparna Shiny Gottem, N. Lingeshwaran, Y. Himath Kumar, Ch. Mallika Chowdary, S. Pratheba, K. Perumal","doi":"10.2478/cee-2023-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Tall buildings have unique seismic challenges, particularly the P-delta effect. This can cause an increase in loads on certain parts of the structure, leading to potential instability or collapse. The solution is to use buckling restrained bracing (BRB) systems, which improve the lateral strength of the structure and control the P-delta effect. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of various brace configurations in reducing the seismic response of a 50-story reinforced concrete structure, with a focus on P-delta effects. To achieve this, linear dynamic analysis (response spectrum analysis) was conducted using E-TAB software. The selection of bracing configuration, however, depends upon the seismic zone. For this reason, five distinct configurations (X-pattern, inverted V, forward inclined, zig-zag, and bare frame) are considered for the analysis of buildings in different seismic zones. A building model was employed to study the behaviour of a structure with and without BRB to compare the parameters of storey drift, story displacement, diaphragm drift, story shear, story stiffness, and story acceleration using E-TAB software. Results showed that both Type-4 and Type-2 braces perform similarly in several aspects in seismic zones III and V. However, Type-2 braces perform slightly better in terms of storey stiffness-Y, with a lower difference of 39-40 % compared to Type-4 braces with a difference of 49 %.","PeriodicalId":42034,"journal":{"name":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"426 - 443"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2023-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Tall buildings have unique seismic challenges, particularly the P-delta effect. This can cause an increase in loads on certain parts of the structure, leading to potential instability or collapse. The solution is to use buckling restrained bracing (BRB) systems, which improve the lateral strength of the structure and control the P-delta effect. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of various brace configurations in reducing the seismic response of a 50-story reinforced concrete structure, with a focus on P-delta effects. To achieve this, linear dynamic analysis (response spectrum analysis) was conducted using E-TAB software. The selection of bracing configuration, however, depends upon the seismic zone. For this reason, five distinct configurations (X-pattern, inverted V, forward inclined, zig-zag, and bare frame) are considered for the analysis of buildings in different seismic zones. A building model was employed to study the behaviour of a structure with and without BRB to compare the parameters of storey drift, story displacement, diaphragm drift, story shear, story stiffness, and story acceleration using E-TAB software. Results showed that both Type-4 and Type-2 braces perform similarly in several aspects in seismic zones III and V. However, Type-2 braces perform slightly better in terms of storey stiffness-Y, with a lower difference of 39-40 % compared to Type-4 braces with a difference of 49 %.
基于ETABS的不同震区约束支撑框架屈曲分析研究
高层建筑具有独特的地震挑战,特别是p - δ效应。这可能会导致结构某些部分的载荷增加,从而导致潜在的不稳定或倒塌。解决方案是使用屈曲约束支撑(BRB)系统,以提高结构的横向强度和控制P-delta效应。本研究旨在确定各种支撑配置在减少50层钢筋混凝土结构地震反应方面的有效性,重点关注P-delta效应。为此,利用E-TAB软件进行了线性动态分析(反应谱分析)。然而,支撑结构的选择取决于地震带。出于这个原因,考虑了五种不同的结构(x型、倒V型、前倾斜、之字形和裸框架)来分析不同地震带的建筑物。采用E-TAB软件,对有BRB和无BRB的建筑模型进行了性能研究,比较了层间位移、层间位移、隔膜位移、层间剪力、层间刚度和层间加速度等参数。结果表明,4型和2型支撑在III和v震区的几个方面表现相似,但2型支撑在层刚度- y方面表现稍好,差值为39- 40%,而4型支撑差值为49%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
58.30%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信