The fashion scandal: Social media, identity and the globalization of fashion in the twenty-first century

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Annamari Vänskä, O. Gurova
{"title":"The fashion scandal: Social media, identity and the globalization of fashion in the twenty-first century","authors":"Annamari Vänskä, O. Gurova","doi":"10.1386/infs_00045_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the latter part of the 2010s, many fashion brands – e.g., Gucci, Burberry, Dolce & Gabbana, Prada, Dior – have been caught up with scandals and called out for racism, cultural appropriation and other types of insensitivity towards vulnerable groups. This article will unpack, through critical analysis of some of these examples, the changing landscape of the ‘fashion scandal’ in the late-2010s. We understand fashion scandals as the fuel of fashion. They are debated in social media and they are controversial actions, statements or events that cause strong emotional responses. Even though scandal has been proven effective in fashion marketing for decades, and despite it is still frequently used, there might be a change on the way. Our examples suggest that with the rise of social media and its so-called ‘citizen journalism’ the tactics of creating scandals may have lost their lustre and can easily turn against the brand. We will also discuss new tactics that brands have adopted to escape undesired scandals by establishing new roles such as the ‘diversity consultant’.","PeriodicalId":42103,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fashion Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fashion Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/infs_00045_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

During the latter part of the 2010s, many fashion brands – e.g., Gucci, Burberry, Dolce & Gabbana, Prada, Dior – have been caught up with scandals and called out for racism, cultural appropriation and other types of insensitivity towards vulnerable groups. This article will unpack, through critical analysis of some of these examples, the changing landscape of the ‘fashion scandal’ in the late-2010s. We understand fashion scandals as the fuel of fashion. They are debated in social media and they are controversial actions, statements or events that cause strong emotional responses. Even though scandal has been proven effective in fashion marketing for decades, and despite it is still frequently used, there might be a change on the way. Our examples suggest that with the rise of social media and its so-called ‘citizen journalism’ the tactics of creating scandals may have lost their lustre and can easily turn against the brand. We will also discuss new tactics that brands have adopted to escape undesired scandals by establishing new roles such as the ‘diversity consultant’.
时尚丑闻:社交媒体、身份认同与21世纪时尚全球化
在2010年代后期,许多时尚品牌——如Gucci、Burberry、Dolce & Gabbana、Prada、Dior——都被卷入了丑闻,并被指责存在种族主义、文化挪用和其他对弱势群体不敏感的行为。本文将通过对其中一些例子的批判性分析,揭示2010年代末“时尚丑闻”不断变化的格局。我们理解时尚丑闻是时尚的燃料。它们在社交媒体上引起争论,它们是引起强烈情绪反应的有争议的行为、声明或事件。尽管几十年来,丑闻在时尚营销中被证明是有效的,尽管它仍然经常被使用,但可能会发生变化。我们的例子表明,随着社交媒体及其所谓的“公民新闻”的兴起,制造丑闻的策略可能已经失去了光泽,很容易对品牌不利。我们还将讨论品牌为避免不想要的丑闻而采取的新策略,比如设立“多元化顾问”等新角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Fashion Studies
International Journal of Fashion Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信