Do Not Let it Be the Last: End-of-Life Care Decisions in the Primary Care Clinic

My-Trang T. Dang, Zohair Ahmed, Jason M. Betcher, Saloni H Kadakia, Samuel J Wisniewski, J. W. Sealey
{"title":"Do Not Let it Be the Last: End-of-Life Care Decisions in the Primary Care Clinic","authors":"My-Trang T. Dang, Zohair Ahmed, Jason M. Betcher, Saloni H Kadakia, Samuel J Wisniewski, J. W. Sealey","doi":"10.51894/001c.9204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT For many patients, end-of-life care (EOLC) wishes are unknown and are generally only brought up during healthcare crises. During such healthcare episodes, loved ones are often distraught, and as such, can find it difficult to focus on details surrounding the event. The best place for these discussions may be in non-acute settings including primary care clinics. The purpose of this study was to examine how well a sample of patients (N = 177) in three Michigan-based primary care teaching clinics thought they and their loved ones were prepared in terms of having their EOLC wishes known. METHODS Prospective data were collected from three Internal Medicine teaching clinics in the Metro-Detroit area through an anonymous written survey addressing EOLC issues in a 16-item cross-sectional study. Respondents were adult patients at one of three participating primary care clinics. Perceived preparedness for EOLC was measured by: 1) possibly having had a prior EOLC discussion with a healthcare provider 2) having created an Advance Directive, such as a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) or Living Will with medical decision preferences, 3) reported preferences for quality versus quantity of life, and 4) preferences for CPR and other specific life-sustaining interventions. RESULTS In this sample, 77 (43.5%) of 177 respondents had discussed their EOLC wishes with a provider. Regarding Advance Directives, 63/177 (35.6%) had established a DPOA, and 59/177 (22%) had made a Living Will. The majority of respondents preferred quality over quantity of life. The most difficult EOLC questions included the decision for CPR, tracheostomy, and PEG tube placement. CONCLUSIONS Based on these results, EOLC discussions probably occur infrequently in the primary care or other healthcare settings. Most survey responses indicated that sample patients were unprepared concerning the details of future EOLC decisions. Engagement of such discussions should be a part of routine visits in the primary care clinic and should be re-visited when there is a change in a patient’s health. Further larger-scale studies using validated surveys are required in this vitally important area of practice. Key Words: advance care planning, end-of-life care conversations, primary care","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spartan medical research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51894/001c.9204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT For many patients, end-of-life care (EOLC) wishes are unknown and are generally only brought up during healthcare crises. During such healthcare episodes, loved ones are often distraught, and as such, can find it difficult to focus on details surrounding the event. The best place for these discussions may be in non-acute settings including primary care clinics. The purpose of this study was to examine how well a sample of patients (N = 177) in three Michigan-based primary care teaching clinics thought they and their loved ones were prepared in terms of having their EOLC wishes known. METHODS Prospective data were collected from three Internal Medicine teaching clinics in the Metro-Detroit area through an anonymous written survey addressing EOLC issues in a 16-item cross-sectional study. Respondents were adult patients at one of three participating primary care clinics. Perceived preparedness for EOLC was measured by: 1) possibly having had a prior EOLC discussion with a healthcare provider 2) having created an Advance Directive, such as a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) or Living Will with medical decision preferences, 3) reported preferences for quality versus quantity of life, and 4) preferences for CPR and other specific life-sustaining interventions. RESULTS In this sample, 77 (43.5%) of 177 respondents had discussed their EOLC wishes with a provider. Regarding Advance Directives, 63/177 (35.6%) had established a DPOA, and 59/177 (22%) had made a Living Will. The majority of respondents preferred quality over quantity of life. The most difficult EOLC questions included the decision for CPR, tracheostomy, and PEG tube placement. CONCLUSIONS Based on these results, EOLC discussions probably occur infrequently in the primary care or other healthcare settings. Most survey responses indicated that sample patients were unprepared concerning the details of future EOLC decisions. Engagement of such discussions should be a part of routine visits in the primary care clinic and should be re-visited when there is a change in a patient’s health. Further larger-scale studies using validated surveys are required in this vitally important area of practice. Key Words: advance care planning, end-of-life care conversations, primary care
不要让它成为最后一个:初级保健诊所的临终关怀决定
对许多患者来说,临终关怀(EOLC)的愿望是未知的,通常只在医疗危机期间提出。在这样的医疗事件中,所爱的人经常心烦意乱,因此很难专注于事件的细节。这些讨论的最佳场所可能是非急性环境,包括初级保健诊所。这项研究的目的是检查密歇根州三家初级保健教学诊所的患者样本(N=177)认为他们和他们的亲人在EOLC愿望方面准备得如何。方法通过一项16项横断面研究中涉及EOLC问题的匿名书面调查,从底特律大都会地区的三家内科教学诊所收集前瞻性数据。受访者是三家参与初级保健诊所之一的成年患者。EOLC的感知准备情况是通过以下方式衡量的:1)可能之前与医疗保健提供者进行过EOLC讨论;2)制定了预先指令,如具有医疗决策偏好的持久授权书(DPOA)或生活遗嘱;3)报告的生活质量与数量的偏好;4)CPR和其他特定的维持生命干预措施的偏好。结果在该样本中,177名受访者中有77人(43.5%)曾与提供者讨论过他们的EOLC愿望。关于预先指示,63/177(35.6%)建立了DPOA,59/177(22%)立下了生前遗嘱。大多数受访者更喜欢生活质量而不是数量。最困难的EOLC问题包括CPR、气管造口术和PEG管放置的决定。结论基于这些结果,EOLC讨论可能在初级保健或其他医疗保健环境中很少发生。大多数调查回复表明,样本患者对未来EOLC决策的细节没有做好准备。参与此类讨论应成为初级保健诊所常规就诊的一部分,当患者健康状况发生变化时,应再次就诊。在这一至关重要的实践领域,需要使用经验证的调查进行进一步的大规模研究。关键词:预先护理计划、临终关怀对话、初级保健
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信