The Plausible Impossible: Chinese Adults Hold Graded Notions of Impossibility

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tianwei Gong, Andrew Shtulman
{"title":"The Plausible Impossible: Chinese Adults Hold Graded Notions of Impossibility","authors":"Tianwei Gong, Andrew Shtulman","doi":"10.1163/15685373-12340097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Events that violate the laws of nature are, by definition, impossible, but recent research suggests that people view some violations as \"more impossible\" than others (Shtulman & Morgan, 2017). When evaluating the difficulty of magic spells, American adults are influenced by causal considerations that should be irrelevant given the spell's primary causal violation, judging, for instance, that it would be more difficult to levitate a bowling ball than a basketball even though weight should no longer be a consideration if contact is no longer necessary for support. In the present study, we sought to test the generalizability of these effects in a non-Western context China where magical events are represented differently in popular fiction and where reasoning styles are often more holistic than analytic. Across several studies, Chinese adults (n = 466) showed the same tendency as American adults to honor implicit causal constraints when evaluating the plausibility of magical events. These findings suggest that graded notions of impossibility are shared across cultures, possibly because they are a byproduct of causal knowledge.","PeriodicalId":46186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Culture","volume":"21 1","pages":"76-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Events that violate the laws of nature are, by definition, impossible, but recent research suggests that people view some violations as "more impossible" than others (Shtulman & Morgan, 2017). When evaluating the difficulty of magic spells, American adults are influenced by causal considerations that should be irrelevant given the spell's primary causal violation, judging, for instance, that it would be more difficult to levitate a bowling ball than a basketball even though weight should no longer be a consideration if contact is no longer necessary for support. In the present study, we sought to test the generalizability of these effects in a non-Western context China where magical events are represented differently in popular fiction and where reasoning styles are often more holistic than analytic. Across several studies, Chinese adults (n = 466) showed the same tendency as American adults to honor implicit causal constraints when evaluating the plausibility of magical events. These findings suggest that graded notions of impossibility are shared across cultures, possibly because they are a byproduct of causal knowledge.
看似不可能的事:中国成年人对不可能的事持有分级的观念
根据定义,违反自然规律的事件是不可能的,但最近的研究表明,人们认为一些违反自然规律的事件比其他事件“更不可能”(Shtulman & Morgan, 2017)。当评估魔法咒语的难度时,美国成年人受到因果因素的影响,而这些因素与咒语的主要因果违反是不相关的,例如,判断一个保龄球比一个篮球更难以悬浮起来,尽管如果身体接触不再需要支撑,重量就不再是一个考虑因素。在本研究中,我们试图在非西方背景下的中国检验这些效应的普遍性。在中国,通俗小说对魔幻事件的描述方式不同,推理风格往往更注重整体而非分析。在几项研究中,中国成年人(n = 466)在评估魔法事件的合理性时,表现出与美国成年人相同的倾向,即尊重隐含的因果约束。这些发现表明,不可能的分级概念在不同文化中是共同的,可能是因为它们是因果知识的副产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Journal of Cognition and Culture PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognition and Culture provides an interdisciplinary forum for exploring the mental foundations of culture and the cultural foundations of mental life. The primary focus of the journal is on explanations of cultural phenomena in terms of acquisition, representation and transmission involving cognitive capacities without excluding the study of cultural differences. The journal contains articles, commentaries, reports of experiments, and book reviews that emerge out of the inquiries by, and conversations between, scholars in experimental psychology, developmental psychology, social cognition, neuroscience, human evolution, cognitive science of religion, and cognitive anthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信