Promoting Spatial Coordination in Flood Buyouts in the United States: Four Strategies and Four Challenges from the Economics of Land Preservation Literature
IF 16.4
1区 化学
Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Polina K. Dineva, Christina McGranaghan, K. Messer, Leah H. Palm‐Forster, L. Paul, A. Siders
求助PDF
{"title":"Promoting Spatial Coordination in Flood Buyouts in the United States: Four Strategies and Four Challenges from the Economics of Land Preservation Literature","authors":"Polina K. Dineva, Christina McGranaghan, K. Messer, Leah H. Palm‐Forster, L. Paul, A. Siders","doi":"10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-1564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Managed retreat in the form of voluntary flood-buyout programs provides homeowners with an alternative to repairing and rebuilding residences that have sustained severe flood damage. Buyout programs are most economically efficient when groups of neighboring properties are acquired because they can then create unfragmented flood control areas and reduce the cost of providing local services. However, buyout programs in the United States often fail to acquire such efficient, unfragmented spaces, for various reasons, including long administrative timelines, the way in which buyout offers are made, desires for community cohesion, and attachments to place. Buyout programs have relied primarily on posted price mechanisms involving offers that are accepted or rejected by homeowners with little or no negotiation. In this paper, we describe four alternative strategies that have been used successfully in land-preservation agricultural – environmental contexts to increase acceptance rates and decrease fragmentation: agglomeration bonuses, reverse auctions, target constraints, and hybrid approaches. We discuss challenges that may arise during their implementation in the buyout context — transaction costs, equity and distributional impacts, unintended consequences, and social pressure — and recommend further research into the efficiency and equity of applying these strategies to residential buyout programs with the explicit goal of promoting spatial coordination. © 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-1564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
: Managed retreat in the form of voluntary flood-buyout programs provides homeowners with an alternative to repairing and rebuilding residences that have sustained severe flood damage. Buyout programs are most economically efficient when groups of neighboring properties are acquired because they can then create unfragmented flood control areas and reduce the cost of providing local services. However, buyout programs in the United States often fail to acquire such efficient, unfragmented spaces, for various reasons, including long administrative timelines, the way in which buyout offers are made, desires for community cohesion, and attachments to place. Buyout programs have relied primarily on posted price mechanisms involving offers that are accepted or rejected by homeowners with little or no negotiation. In this paper, we describe four alternative strategies that have been used successfully in land-preservation agricultural – environmental contexts to increase acceptance rates and decrease fragmentation: agglomeration bonuses, reverse auctions, target constraints, and hybrid approaches. We discuss challenges that may arise during their implementation in the buyout context — transaction costs, equity and distributional impacts, unintended consequences, and social pressure — and recommend further research into the efficiency and equity of applying these strategies to residential buyout programs with the explicit goal of promoting spatial coordination. © 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
促进美国洪水收购的空间协调:来自土地保护经济学文献的四个策略和四个挑战
:以自愿洪水买断计划的形式进行的有管理的撤退为房主提供了一种修复和重建遭受严重洪水破坏的住宅的替代方案。当收购一组相邻的房产时,收购计划在经济上最有效,因为它们可以创建无分割的防洪区,并降低提供当地服务的成本。然而,由于各种原因,包括行政时间长、提出收购要约的方式、对社区凝聚力的渴望以及对地方的依恋,美国的收购计划往往无法获得如此高效、无分割的空间。收购计划主要依赖于公布的价格机制,包括房主在很少或根本没有协商的情况下接受或拒绝的报价。在本文中,我们描述了四种在土地保护农业-环境背景下成功使用的替代策略,以提高接受率和减少碎片化:集聚奖金、反向拍卖、目标约束和混合方法。我们讨论了在收购背景下实施过程中可能出现的挑战——交易成本、公平和分配影响、意外后果和社会压力——并建议进一步研究将这些策略应用于住宅收购计划的效率和公平性,明确目标是促进空间协调。©2022美国土木工程师学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。