Thiago Rodrigues dos Santos, Adriano Marques de Souza, Fábio Luis Bondezan, P. Eterovick
{"title":"Going Underground: What the Natural History Traits of Cave Users Can Tell Us about Cave Use Propensity","authors":"Thiago Rodrigues dos Santos, Adriano Marques de Souza, Fábio Luis Bondezan, P. Eterovick","doi":"10.1670/20-055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Amphibians and reptiles use caves in different lithologies and biomes. However, the ecological reasons for such behavior have so far not been investigated in a broad scale. We surveyed 945 Brazilian caves in three biomes (Caatinga, Cerrado, and the Amazon), from which 269 had frogs and reptiles. We classified species of amphibians (34) and reptiles (19) according to natural history traits including habit, activity, diet composition, foraging strategy, and developmental mode (anurans). We used IUCN species distribution maps to predict what species occur in the vicinities of the caves but did not use them to test whether specific life history traits were distributed differently between species using and not using caves. We also tested seasonality and occurrence of bodies of water inside caves used by anurans, as well as the area occupied by man-made building and infrastructure around caves as explanatory factors for cave use intensity. Anurans with direct development were more likely to use caves than those with a tadpole stage. Terrestrial anurans were more likely to use caves than arboreal and semiarboreal anurans. No fossorial, semifossorial, or semiaquatic species used caves. Among reptiles, sit-and-wait foragers were more likely to use caves than active foragers. Semiaquatic and terrestrial reptiles were the most likely to use caves. Anurans were most likely to use caves with perennial bodies of water and during the dry season. Our results indicate that species of the herpetofauna are likely to search for resources in the cave habitat as indicated by the relationship between specific life history traits and cave use.","PeriodicalId":54821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Herpetology","volume":"56 1","pages":"153 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1670/20-055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract. Amphibians and reptiles use caves in different lithologies and biomes. However, the ecological reasons for such behavior have so far not been investigated in a broad scale. We surveyed 945 Brazilian caves in three biomes (Caatinga, Cerrado, and the Amazon), from which 269 had frogs and reptiles. We classified species of amphibians (34) and reptiles (19) according to natural history traits including habit, activity, diet composition, foraging strategy, and developmental mode (anurans). We used IUCN species distribution maps to predict what species occur in the vicinities of the caves but did not use them to test whether specific life history traits were distributed differently between species using and not using caves. We also tested seasonality and occurrence of bodies of water inside caves used by anurans, as well as the area occupied by man-made building and infrastructure around caves as explanatory factors for cave use intensity. Anurans with direct development were more likely to use caves than those with a tadpole stage. Terrestrial anurans were more likely to use caves than arboreal and semiarboreal anurans. No fossorial, semifossorial, or semiaquatic species used caves. Among reptiles, sit-and-wait foragers were more likely to use caves than active foragers. Semiaquatic and terrestrial reptiles were the most likely to use caves. Anurans were most likely to use caves with perennial bodies of water and during the dry season. Our results indicate that species of the herpetofauna are likely to search for resources in the cave habitat as indicated by the relationship between specific life history traits and cave use.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Herpetology accepts manuscripts on all aspects on the biology of amphibians and reptiles including their behavior, conservation, ecology, morphology, physiology, and systematics, as well as herpetological education. We encourage authors to submit manuscripts that are data-driven and rigorous tests of hypotheses, or provide thorough descriptions of novel taxa (living or fossil). Topics may address theoretical issues in a thoughtful, quantitative way. Reviews and policy papers that provide new insight on the herpetological sciences are also welcome, but they must be more than simple literature reviews. These papers must have a central focus that propose a new argument for understanding a concept or a new approach for answering a question or solving a problem. Focus sections that combine papers on related topics are normally determined by the Editors. Publication in the Long-Term Perspectives section is by invitation only. Papers on captive breeding, new techniques or sampling methods, anecdotal or isolated natural history observations, geographic range extensions, and essays should be submitted to our sister journal, Herpetological Review.