Land management drives dynamic changes to microbial function through edaphic factors and soil biota

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Jacob R. Hopkins , Tatiana A. Semenova-Nelsen , Benjamin A. Sikes
{"title":"Land management drives dynamic changes to microbial function through edaphic factors and soil biota","authors":"Jacob R. Hopkins ,&nbsp;Tatiana A. Semenova-Nelsen ,&nbsp;Benjamin A. Sikes","doi":"10.1016/j.pedobi.2022.150859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Land management for conservation alters the abiotic and biotic components that underly belowground ecosystem health and function. We know that prescribed burning and grazing influence soil characteristics, nutrients, and biota individually, but rarely have these management effects been explored holistically, affecting an interacting belowground system. Since most belowground functions (e.g., nutrient cycling) arise from feedbacks among many soil factors, a better understanding of system-level responses to distinct management practices, rather than individual component responses, can help us better predict these ecosystem functions. In a late successional tallgrass prairie ecosystem, we contrasted how prescribed fire and mowing altered nutrient cycles<span> through changes to the abiotic soil environment, microbial community structure, and microbial </span></span>enzyme functions. Individual soil factors responded rapidly to both fire and mowing, and remained different from pre-treatment values. However, as a system, many relationships among soil factors that were present before management and lost directly after management, returned 1 month after management. This shows the system-level resilience to management supported by the long evolutionary history between grasslands, fire, and grazing, and illustrates the importance of understanding management effects from a holistic perspective. Since global disturbance regimes and anthropological influence are predicted to change in the future, understanding how belowground components respond to change as a system can help land managers and </span>ecologists alike conserve endangered ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49711,"journal":{"name":"Pedobiologia","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 150859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405622016213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Land management for conservation alters the abiotic and biotic components that underly belowground ecosystem health and function. We know that prescribed burning and grazing influence soil characteristics, nutrients, and biota individually, but rarely have these management effects been explored holistically, affecting an interacting belowground system. Since most belowground functions (e.g., nutrient cycling) arise from feedbacks among many soil factors, a better understanding of system-level responses to distinct management practices, rather than individual component responses, can help us better predict these ecosystem functions. In a late successional tallgrass prairie ecosystem, we contrasted how prescribed fire and mowing altered nutrient cycles through changes to the abiotic soil environment, microbial community structure, and microbial enzyme functions. Individual soil factors responded rapidly to both fire and mowing, and remained different from pre-treatment values. However, as a system, many relationships among soil factors that were present before management and lost directly after management, returned 1 month after management. This shows the system-level resilience to management supported by the long evolutionary history between grasslands, fire, and grazing, and illustrates the importance of understanding management effects from a holistic perspective. Since global disturbance regimes and anthropological influence are predicted to change in the future, understanding how belowground components respond to change as a system can help land managers and ecologists alike conserve endangered ecosystems.

Abstract Image

土地管理通过土壤因子和土壤生物群驱动微生物功能的动态变化
土地保护管理改变了地下生态系统健康和功能的非生物和生物成分。我们知道,规定的焚烧和放牧会单独影响土壤特征、养分和生物群,但很少对这些管理效果进行整体探索,影响相互作用的地下系统。由于大多数地下功能(如养分循环)来自许多土壤因子之间的反馈,因此更好地了解系统层面对不同管理措施的响应,而不是单个成分的响应,可以帮助我们更好地预测这些生态系统功能。在一个演替晚的高草草原生态系统中,我们对比了明火和刈割是如何通过改变非生物土壤环境、微生物群落结构和微生物酶功能来改变养分循环的。个别土壤因子对火灾和刈割均有快速响应,且与处理前值仍有差异。然而,作为一个系统,土壤因子之间的许多关系在管理前存在,管理后直接消失,在管理后1个月又恢复了。这显示了在草原、火灾和放牧之间的漫长进化历史的支持下,系统层面对管理的恢复能力,并说明了从整体角度理解管理效果的重要性。由于预计全球扰动机制和人类学影响将在未来发生变化,了解地下组成部分如何作为一个系统对变化作出反应可以帮助土地管理者和生态学家保护濒危生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedobiologia
Pedobiologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Pedobiologia publishes peer reviewed articles describing original work in the field of soil ecology, which includes the study of soil organisms and their interactions with factors in their biotic and abiotic environments. Analysis of biological structures, interactions, functions, and processes in soil is fundamental for understanding the dynamical nature of terrestrial ecosystems, a prerequisite for appropriate soil management. The scope of this journal consists of fundamental and applied aspects of soil ecology; key focal points include interactions among organisms in soil, organismal controls on soil processes, causes and consequences of soil biodiversity, and aboveground-belowground interactions. We publish: original research that tests clearly defined hypotheses addressing topics of current interest in soil ecology (including studies demonstrating nonsignificant effects); descriptions of novel methodological approaches, or evaluations of current approaches, that address a clear need in soil ecology research; innovative syntheses of the soil ecology literature, including metaanalyses, topical in depth reviews and short opinion/perspective pieces, and descriptions of original conceptual frameworks; and short notes reporting novel observations of ecological significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信