The Five Faces of an Assessor: Conceptualizing the Enactment of Teacher Assessment Identity in Vocational Education and Training

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Julie Klovholt Leonardsen, B. K. Utvær, Henning Fjørtoft
{"title":"The Five Faces of an Assessor: Conceptualizing the Enactment of Teacher Assessment Identity in Vocational Education and Training","authors":"Julie Klovholt Leonardsen, B. K. Utvær, Henning Fjørtoft","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2022.2106967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Teacher assessment practice is affected by a complex set of cognitive and affective traits, as well as institutional contexts. There is a dearth of research on sociocultural influences on teachers’ assessment identity. This study presents a model illustrating how vocational education and training (VET) teachers enact their assessment identity across contexts. We draw on interview data from 18 VET teachers. Using metaphors found in the data set allowed us to capture key aspects of the data material and to situate this study in the existing literature on teachers’ assessment identity. Based on the findings, we conceptualize five “faces” of VET teachers’ assessment identity: 1) the quality controller, 2) the educator, 3) the fosterer, 4) the motivator, and 5) the negotiator. We then show how VET teachers enact these faces within and across contexts as a way of negotiating tensions and avoiding conflicts. Finally, we discuss the implications of this model.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"27 1","pages":"339 - 355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2022.2106967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Teacher assessment practice is affected by a complex set of cognitive and affective traits, as well as institutional contexts. There is a dearth of research on sociocultural influences on teachers’ assessment identity. This study presents a model illustrating how vocational education and training (VET) teachers enact their assessment identity across contexts. We draw on interview data from 18 VET teachers. Using metaphors found in the data set allowed us to capture key aspects of the data material and to situate this study in the existing literature on teachers’ assessment identity. Based on the findings, we conceptualize five “faces” of VET teachers’ assessment identity: 1) the quality controller, 2) the educator, 3) the fosterer, 4) the motivator, and 5) the negotiator. We then show how VET teachers enact these faces within and across contexts as a way of negotiating tensions and avoiding conflicts. Finally, we discuss the implications of this model.
评量者的五面:职业教育与培训教师评量认同制定之构想
教师评估实践受到一系列复杂的认知和情感特征以及制度背景的影响。社会文化对教师评价认同的影响研究较少。本研究提出了一个模型,说明职业教育与培训(VET)教师如何在不同背景下制定他们的评估身份。我们收集了18位职业教育培训教师的访谈数据。使用数据集中发现的隐喻使我们能够捕获数据材料的关键方面,并将本研究置于现有的关于教师评估身份的文献中。基于这些发现,我们将职业教育教师评估认同的五个“面孔”概念化:1)质量控制者、2)教育者、3)培养者、4)激励者和5)谈判者。然后,我们展示了职业教育教师如何在不同的背景下和不同的背景下塑造这些面孔,作为一种协商紧张局势和避免冲突的方式。最后,我们讨论了该模型的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Assessment
Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信