High Risk Parahisian Pathways - Mid Septal and Anteroseptal: Feasibility, Advantages, Safety and Outcomes of Alternate Site Approach– A Single Centre Study

Q4 Medicine
S. Krishnappa, J. Rachaiah, Srinidhi S. Hegde, K. Sadananda, M. Nanjappa, Govardhan Ramasanjeevaiah, R. Kanakalakshmi
{"title":"High Risk Parahisian Pathways - Mid Septal and Anteroseptal: Feasibility, Advantages, Safety and Outcomes of Alternate Site Approach– A Single Centre Study","authors":"S. Krishnappa, J. Rachaiah, Srinidhi S. Hegde, K. Sadananda, M. Nanjappa, Govardhan Ramasanjeevaiah, R. Kanakalakshmi","doi":"10.5530/JCDR.2018.2.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation is the treatment of choice for symptomatic accessory pathways (APs). Parahisian pathways – mid septal and anteroseptal APs are rare, but associated with lower success rates and higher incidence of atrioventricular (AV) block. Various techniques and approaches were explored to make the procedure, more safe and successful. Trans aortic cuspal approach, ventricular end ablation, catheter inversion technique, cryo-energy, superior approach and many more have been tried to make it safer. Methods: We present a case series of 12 patients with parahisian pathways, where in jugular or superior approach was used, and these pathways were mapped electrophysiologically and ablated successfully by radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) without any complications through jugular approach. Results: In all 12 patients, radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of accessory pathways was done from jugular approach. The mean number of therapies required were 3(2 to 7). Mean procedure time of 43(20 to 120) min, mean fluoroscopy time of 11.6 (8 to 25) min. Not even a single patient had transient or permanent AV block. During a mean follow-up period of 24 (8-45) months, all 12 patients are asymptomatic without any symptoms, pre-excitation on ECG or documented arrhythmias. Conclusion: It is easier, safer and faster to ablate these accessory pathways from superior or jugular approach.","PeriodicalId":15222,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"71-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/JCDR.2018.2.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation is the treatment of choice for symptomatic accessory pathways (APs). Parahisian pathways – mid septal and anteroseptal APs are rare, but associated with lower success rates and higher incidence of atrioventricular (AV) block. Various techniques and approaches were explored to make the procedure, more safe and successful. Trans aortic cuspal approach, ventricular end ablation, catheter inversion technique, cryo-energy, superior approach and many more have been tried to make it safer. Methods: We present a case series of 12 patients with parahisian pathways, where in jugular or superior approach was used, and these pathways were mapped electrophysiologically and ablated successfully by radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) without any complications through jugular approach. Results: In all 12 patients, radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of accessory pathways was done from jugular approach. The mean number of therapies required were 3(2 to 7). Mean procedure time of 43(20 to 120) min, mean fluoroscopy time of 11.6 (8 to 25) min. Not even a single patient had transient or permanent AV block. During a mean follow-up period of 24 (8-45) months, all 12 patients are asymptomatic without any symptoms, pre-excitation on ECG or documented arrhythmias. Conclusion: It is easier, safer and faster to ablate these accessory pathways from superior or jugular approach.
一项单中心研究:中间隔和前间隔的高风险旁路:可行性、优势、安全性和结果
背景:射频导管消融是治疗症状性附属通路(APs)的首选方法。旁导通路-中间隔和前间隔ap是罕见的,但与较低的成功率和较高的房室传导阻滞发生率相关。为了使手术更加安全和成功,我们探索了各种技术和方法。经主动脉瓣尖入路、心室末端消融、导管倒置技术、低温能量、优越入路等许多方法都已被尝试以使其更安全。方法:我们报告了12例经颈静脉入路或经颈静脉入路的旁静脉通路患者的病例系列,并对这些通路进行了电生理定位,并通过颈静脉入路通过射频导管消融(RFA)成功消融,无任何并发症。结果:12例患者均从颈静脉入路行旁道射频消融(RFA)。所需的平均治疗次数为3次(2至7次)。平均手术时间为43(20至120)分钟,平均透视时间为11.6(8至25)分钟。甚至没有一个患者出现短暂或永久性房室传导阻滞。在平均24(8-45)个月的随访期间,12例患者均无症状,无心电图预兴奋或记录的心律失常。结论:从颈静脉入路或上颈静脉入路切除这些副通路更容易、更安全、更快捷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信