A school-wide digital programme has context specific impacts on self-regulation but not social skills

Q1 Social Sciences
S. McNaughton, N. Rosedale, Tong Zhu, L. Teng, R. Jesson, Jacinta Oldehaver, Rashina Hoda, Rachel Williamson
{"title":"A school-wide digital programme has context specific impacts on self-regulation but not social skills","authors":"S. McNaughton, N. Rosedale, Tong Zhu, L. Teng, R. Jesson, Jacinta Oldehaver, Rashina Hoda, Rachel Williamson","doi":"10.1177/20427530231156282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is assumed that digital tools with ubiquitous classroom use have affordances for student agency and a range of social skills. However, few studies have explored the generalised impact of everyday digital classrooms on self-regulation and empathy, perspective taking and prosocial skills. Ten and 11 year old students’ ( n = 115) ratings of self-regulation, social skills and personality were examined in relationship to school-wide practices and instructional foci in two groups of schools ( n = 9) involved in a digital innovation serving low-SES culturally diverse communities. In an early adopting group, students had received a high dosage of three or 4 years of 1:1 digital pedagogy, and in a later adopting group of schools, students had received a low dosage of only 6 months . This natural experiment revealed a context specific effect where high dosage students rated their regulation in digital contexts higher, but not in more general non-digital contexts. However, personality scores particularly those related to self-regulation, were higher for the high dosage students. There were no differences in social skills. The differences were related to the strong focus in the digital innovation on aspects of self-regulation. There was less focus on social skills in the digital innovation. More deliberate teacher augmentation and instructional designs for social skills may be required to capitalise on the affordances of digital tools. School-wide practices, while necessary may not be sufficient to enable the generalisation of skills without this deliberate teacher focus.","PeriodicalId":39456,"journal":{"name":"E-Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231156282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is assumed that digital tools with ubiquitous classroom use have affordances for student agency and a range of social skills. However, few studies have explored the generalised impact of everyday digital classrooms on self-regulation and empathy, perspective taking and prosocial skills. Ten and 11 year old students’ ( n = 115) ratings of self-regulation, social skills and personality were examined in relationship to school-wide practices and instructional foci in two groups of schools ( n = 9) involved in a digital innovation serving low-SES culturally diverse communities. In an early adopting group, students had received a high dosage of three or 4 years of 1:1 digital pedagogy, and in a later adopting group of schools, students had received a low dosage of only 6 months . This natural experiment revealed a context specific effect where high dosage students rated their regulation in digital contexts higher, but not in more general non-digital contexts. However, personality scores particularly those related to self-regulation, were higher for the high dosage students. There were no differences in social skills. The differences were related to the strong focus in the digital innovation on aspects of self-regulation. There was less focus on social skills in the digital innovation. More deliberate teacher augmentation and instructional designs for social skills may be required to capitalise on the affordances of digital tools. School-wide practices, while necessary may not be sufficient to enable the generalisation of skills without this deliberate teacher focus.
一项全校范围的数字课程对自律有特定情境的影响,但对社交技能没有影响
人们认为,在课堂上普遍使用的数字工具对学生代理和一系列社交技能有帮助。然而,很少有研究探讨日常数字课堂对自我调节和同理心、观点采纳和亲社会技能的普遍影响。在两组学校(n = 9)中,研究了10岁和11岁学生(n = 115)的自我调节、社会技能和个性评分与全校实践和教学重点的关系,这些学校参与了一项服务于低社会经济地位文化多样化社区的数字创新。在早期采用组中,学生接受了3年或4年的高剂量1:1数字教学,而在较晚采用组的学校中,学生只接受了6个月的低剂量。这个自然实验揭示了一种特定环境的效应,高剂量的学生在数字环境中对自己的调节能力的评价更高,但在更一般的非数字环境中却没有。然而,高剂量学生的人格得分,尤其是那些与自我调节有关的得分,更高。在社交技巧上没有差异。这些差异与数字创新对自我监管方面的强烈关注有关。在数字创新中,对社交技能的关注较少。为了充分利用数字工具的优势,可能需要更多深思熟虑的教师培训和社交技能教学设计。学校范围内的实践虽然是必要的,但如果没有教师的刻意关注,可能不足以使技能普遍化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
E-Learning
E-Learning Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: E-Learning and Digital Media is a peer-reviewed international journal directed towards the study and research of e-learning in its diverse aspects: pedagogical, curricular, sociological, economic, philosophical and political. This journal explores the ways that different disciplines and alternative approaches can shed light on the study of technically mediated education. Working at the intersection of theoretical psychology, sociology, history, politics and philosophy it poses new questions and offers new answers for research and practice related to digital technologies in education. The change of the title of the journal in 2010 from E-Learning to E-Learning and Digital Media is expressive of this new and emphatically interdisciplinary orientation, and also reflects the fact that technologically-mediated education needs to be located within the political economy and informational ecology of changing mediatic forms.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信