The Impact of Focusing on Different Features During Encoding on Young and Older Adults’ Source Memory

K. Mitchell, E. Hill
{"title":"The Impact of Focusing on Different Features During Encoding on Young and Older Adults’ Source Memory","authors":"K. Mitchell, E. Hill","doi":"10.1515/psych-2018-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Age-related source memory deficits result, in part, because young and older adults attend to different information. We asked whether focusing young and older adults‘ attention on specific features at encoding would result in similar subjective experiences of the vividness of the features and how this might affect source memory. Ratings of the vividness of visual detail, emotion, and associations were similar for young and older adults both when they were perceiving pictures and when they were thinking about them after a brief delay. Although young adults had better source memory than older adults, source accuracy did not differ depending on feature attended, and correlations between ratings and source memory showed that focus on the different types of information was equally predictive of source memory accuracy for young and older adults. Although preliminary, the results suggest that when attention is focused on specific information at encoding, young and older adults later use the various categories of source-specifying information similarly in making source attributions. Nevertheless, older adults did worse on the source test, suggesting they had less discriminable source information overall, this information was not well bound, and/or they experienced difficulty in strategic retrieval and monitoring processes.","PeriodicalId":74357,"journal":{"name":"Open psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"106 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/psych-2018-0008","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract Age-related source memory deficits result, in part, because young and older adults attend to different information. We asked whether focusing young and older adults‘ attention on specific features at encoding would result in similar subjective experiences of the vividness of the features and how this might affect source memory. Ratings of the vividness of visual detail, emotion, and associations were similar for young and older adults both when they were perceiving pictures and when they were thinking about them after a brief delay. Although young adults had better source memory than older adults, source accuracy did not differ depending on feature attended, and correlations between ratings and source memory showed that focus on the different types of information was equally predictive of source memory accuracy for young and older adults. Although preliminary, the results suggest that when attention is focused on specific information at encoding, young and older adults later use the various categories of source-specifying information similarly in making source attributions. Nevertheless, older adults did worse on the source test, suggesting they had less discriminable source information overall, this information was not well bound, and/or they experienced difficulty in strategic retrieval and monitoring processes.
编码过程中对不同特征的关注对青年和老年人源记忆的影响
与年龄相关的源记忆缺陷的部分原因是年轻人和老年人关注的信息不同。我们询问年轻人和老年人在编码时将注意力集中在特定特征上是否会导致对特征生动性的相似主观体验,以及这可能如何影响源记忆。年轻人和老年人对视觉细节、情感和联想的生动度评分是相似的,无论是在他们感知图片时,还是在他们短暂延迟后思考图片时。尽管年轻人比老年人有更好的源记忆,但源记忆的准确性并不因特征的不同而不同,评分和源记忆之间的相关性表明,对不同类型信息的关注对年轻人和老年人的源记忆准确性具有同样的预测作用。虽然是初步的,但结果表明,当注意力在编码时集中在特定信息上时,年轻人和老年人随后在进行源归因时使用各种类型的源指定信息的方式相似。然而,老年人在信息源测试中表现较差,这表明他们总体上有较少的可辨别的信息源,这些信息没有很好地绑定,和/或他们在策略检索和监测过程中遇到困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信