THE TROUBLESOME KINSHIP, OR, HOW ARE FAMILY TRAGEDIES DISCUSSED IN AN ANONYMOUS ONLINE COMMUNITY

Q3 Social Sciences
A. Altukhova
{"title":"THE TROUBLESOME KINSHIP, OR, HOW ARE FAMILY TRAGEDIES DISCUSSED IN AN ANONYMOUS ONLINE COMMUNITY","authors":"A. Altukhova","doi":"10.31250/1815-8870-2023-19-57-11-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": this paper focuses on public debates about kinship and family ties in the online group “Anonim 03”—the Buryat online community on the social network “Vkontakte”. it explores why some people want to “air their dirty laundry”, telling strangers stories about intimate details of their family lives and breakdowns of mutual care, and why others will­ ingly participate in these discussions. this article attempts to trace not only the terms in which connections between different people of kin are defined today, but also to unravel the mechanisms and global principles that, according to the participants of this community, dictate the life of a person who has a family. observing only the presentation of family in the anonymous stories, this article argues that it is nevertheless possible to trace the circulation of the so­called “substances of kinship” according to sharon hutchinson—and simultaneously the circulation of affects, as sarah Ahmed suggests—to see what new objects are born out of this discussion. Although debates in “Anonim 03” often resemble a tV show where participants try to hurt each other, i want to argue that these debates are a much more serious process than just entertainment. i suggest that they constitute a space for ethical reasoning and fixing moral norms of kinship relations, if for a very short period.","PeriodicalId":52194,"journal":{"name":"Antropologicheskij Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antropologicheskij Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2023-19-57-11-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: this paper focuses on public debates about kinship and family ties in the online group “Anonim 03”—the Buryat online community on the social network “Vkontakte”. it explores why some people want to “air their dirty laundry”, telling strangers stories about intimate details of their family lives and breakdowns of mutual care, and why others will­ ingly participate in these discussions. this article attempts to trace not only the terms in which connections between different people of kin are defined today, but also to unravel the mechanisms and global principles that, according to the participants of this community, dictate the life of a person who has a family. observing only the presentation of family in the anonymous stories, this article argues that it is nevertheless possible to trace the circulation of the so­called “substances of kinship” according to sharon hutchinson—and simultaneously the circulation of affects, as sarah Ahmed suggests—to see what new objects are born out of this discussion. Although debates in “Anonim 03” often resemble a tV show where participants try to hurt each other, i want to argue that these debates are a much more serious process than just entertainment. i suggest that they constitute a space for ethical reasoning and fixing moral norms of kinship relations, if for a very short period.
麻烦的亲属关系,或者,家庭悲剧如何在一个匿名的网络社区讨论
:本文关注的是社交网络“Vkontakte”上的布里亚特在线社区“Anonim 03”中关于亲属关系和家庭关系的公开辩论。它探讨了为什么有些人想“晒脏衣服”,向陌生人讲述他们家庭生活的亲密细节和相互照顾的破裂,以及为什么其他人会积极参与这些讨论。这篇文章不仅试图追溯今天定义不同亲属之间联系的术语,还试图揭示这个社区的参与者所说的决定一个有家庭的人的生活的机制和全球原则。本文只观察了匿名故事中家庭的表现,认为根据沙伦·胡钦森的说法,追踪所谓的“亲属物质”的流通是可能的——同时,正如萨拉·艾哈迈德所建议的那样,追踪情感的流通——看看这场讨论会产生什么新的对象。尽管《Anonim 03》中的辩论通常类似于tV节目,参与者试图互相伤害,但我想说,这些辩论是一个比娱乐更严肃的过程。我认为,它们构成了一个伦理推理和确定亲属关系道德规范的空间,即使时间很短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antropologicheskij Forum
Antropologicheskij Forum Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信