Fact-Checking and Check-Worthiness Determination on Tempo.co during Covid-19 Pandemic

Annisa Nurul Hanifah, Z. M. Z. Monggilo
{"title":"Fact-Checking and Check-Worthiness Determination on Tempo.co during Covid-19 Pandemic","authors":"Annisa Nurul Hanifah, Z. M. Z. Monggilo","doi":"10.24329/aspikom.v7i1.1063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fact-checking journalism appears with its purpose to improve the quality of information, especially during COVID-19, where hoaxes spread massively. Moreover, a fact-checking organization needs to be more selective in choosing claims based on check-worthiness criteria, including Cek Fakta Tempo.co. The study described how Cek Fakta Tempo.co determine the check-worthiness of a claim during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted on case study methods to describe the dynamics and process during a claim selection. The data collection process occurred during February-July 2021, using an in-depth interview with Tempo.co fact-checkers, documentation, and literature study. The study found that Cek Fakta Tempo.co fact-checking methodology consists of three stages, pre-examination, fact-checking process, and post-examination. Moreover, the check-worthiness of a claim is determined at the pre-examination stage by conducting editorial meetings that rely on several considerations. The consideration includes five substantive criteria (viral claims, speaker impact, urgency, proximity, and intention) and also digital tools obtained from the external collaboration.","PeriodicalId":31734,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Aspikom","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Aspikom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v7i1.1063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Fact-checking journalism appears with its purpose to improve the quality of information, especially during COVID-19, where hoaxes spread massively. Moreover, a fact-checking organization needs to be more selective in choosing claims based on check-worthiness criteria, including Cek Fakta Tempo.co. The study described how Cek Fakta Tempo.co determine the check-worthiness of a claim during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted on case study methods to describe the dynamics and process during a claim selection. The data collection process occurred during February-July 2021, using an in-depth interview with Tempo.co fact-checkers, documentation, and literature study. The study found that Cek Fakta Tempo.co fact-checking methodology consists of three stages, pre-examination, fact-checking process, and post-examination. Moreover, the check-worthiness of a claim is determined at the pre-examination stage by conducting editorial meetings that rely on several considerations. The consideration includes five substantive criteria (viral claims, speaker impact, urgency, proximity, and intention) and also digital tools obtained from the external collaboration.
节奏上的事实检验与检验价值判定。Covid-19大流行期间的co
事实核查新闻的出现是为了提高信息质量,特别是在COVID-19期间,骗局大量传播。此外,事实核查组织需要根据可核查性标准更有选择性地选择索赔,包括Cek Fakta Tempo.co。该研究描述了Cek Fakta的节奏。在COVID-19大流行期间确定索赔的可靠性。本研究采用案例研究方法来描述索赔选择过程中的动态和过程。数据收集过程发生在2021年2月至7月,使用了Tempo的深度访谈。共同的事实核查,文件和文献研究。研究发现,Cek Fakta Tempo。公司的事实核查方法包括三个阶段,即事前审查、事实核查过程和事后审查。此外,索赔的可核查性是在预审查阶段通过召开编辑会议来确定的,该会议依赖于几个考虑因素。考虑因素包括五个实质性标准(病毒式声明、演讲者影响、紧迫性、接近性和意图)以及从外部合作中获得的数字工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信