Sample processing impacts on single wet sieve aggregate stability analysis

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Glenn Arthur Garcia, Jason G. Warren, Sergio Abit, Chime Garcia, Grace Flusche Ogden
{"title":"Sample processing impacts on single wet sieve aggregate stability analysis","authors":"Glenn Arthur Garcia,&nbsp;Jason G. Warren,&nbsp;Sergio Abit,&nbsp;Chime Garcia,&nbsp;Grace Flusche Ogden","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil aggregate stability is widely considered an indicator of soil health. However, there is a lack of test procedure standardization for this soil property. Presently, air-drying and manual grinding are commonly used in preparing samples for testing, which are time-consuming and labor intensive. This study evaluated oven-drying (65 °C) aggregates and processing by either disk or flail mechanical grinders as a way to improve efficiency of conducting aggregate stability analysis as compared with air drying and manual grinding. Surface soil samples were collected from forest, grassland, no-till, and cultivated areas across 22 fields in Oklahoma with textures ranging from sandy loam to clay loam. The stable fractions of oven-dried samples were highly correlated to the results of the analysis that used air-drying. The stable fractions of mechanically ground samples were also highly correlated with manually ground samples. Oven-drying in combination with either of the grinding methods is a suitable way of improving the efficiency of soil aggregate stability analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil aggregate stability is widely considered an indicator of soil health. However, there is a lack of test procedure standardization for this soil property. Presently, air-drying and manual grinding are commonly used in preparing samples for testing, which are time-consuming and labor intensive. This study evaluated oven-drying (65 °C) aggregates and processing by either disk or flail mechanical grinders as a way to improve efficiency of conducting aggregate stability analysis as compared with air drying and manual grinding. Surface soil samples were collected from forest, grassland, no-till, and cultivated areas across 22 fields in Oklahoma with textures ranging from sandy loam to clay loam. The stable fractions of oven-dried samples were highly correlated to the results of the analysis that used air-drying. The stable fractions of mechanically ground samples were also highly correlated with manually ground samples. Oven-drying in combination with either of the grinding methods is a suitable way of improving the efficiency of soil aggregate stability analysis.

Abstract Image

样品处理对单一湿筛骨料稳定性分析的影响
土壤团聚体稳定性被广泛认为是土壤健康的一个指标。然而,目前对这种土壤特性的测试程序缺乏标准化。目前,样品制备常用风干法和手工研磨法,耗时长,劳动强度大。本研究评估了烘箱干燥(65°C)骨料和用圆盘或连片机械研磨机处理,与空气干燥和人工研磨相比,可以提高骨料稳定性分析的效率。表层土壤样本采集自俄克拉何马州22块土地的森林、草地、免耕和耕地,质地从砂壤土到粘壤土不等。烘箱干燥样品的稳定组分与空气干燥分析结果高度相关。机械研磨样品的稳定组分也与人工研磨样品高度相关。烘箱干燥与任一研磨方法相结合是提高土壤团聚体稳定性分析效率的一种合适方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信